News in Brief: France, Modern Scalp Treatment. "A new fad in gay paree is the 'mohican haircut' - a scalp job just like the Indians used to do. When the barber gets through with these 'young bucks' - they're ready for the warpath." Very ordinary-looking hair salon/ barbershop. Young man sits down and gets what would later be known as a Mohawk haircut. (I guess there is nothing new under the sun.) Other customers sit and wait, one looks at photo of Native American (?) in a book. Two teenage boys show off their new hairstyles. Another waiting patron looks disapprovingly away, back to the newspaper he's reading. One of those wacky trends of crazy youth. Ahead of their time, pioneers.
Goodwill Envoys: Embassy Children Bring New Year Greeting. Here's a cheery New Year greeting, from scores of youngsters dressed in their native costumes. Children of embassy officials from many lands, they extend season's greeting to the children of America. Those who speak include representatives from Mexico, Cuba, Italy, Guatemala, Norway (some speak first in their native tongue, then in English). Cute. Then all shout in unison, "Happy New Year From All of the World!"
1951: Year of Stalemate. (1951 Highlights - most or all of these exist in longer form within our library)
(12:30:01)(tape # 10118 begins) Mr. ROLLA, No, the manual does not. Mr. BEN-VENISTE. It does not. The distinction is obviously made between the scene of a death and a workplace investigation related to a suicide that occurs in a different location; is that correct? Mr. ROLLA. That's correct. (12:30:20) Mr. BEN-VENISTE. Finally, with respect to your experience in investigating suicides, Sergeant Braun, how many suicides had you investigated prior to July 20, 1993? Ms, BRAUN. I had done one prior. 192 Mr. BEN-VENISTE. One prior. In that case, I trust the workplace was not sealed? Ms. BRAUN. The workplace wasn't relevant. Mr. BEN-VENISTE. In your collective experience, including Major Hines', I trust there has been no example of a workplace being sealed or requested to be sealed where that workplace was not the scene of the death; is that correct? Mr. HINES. That's correct. Mr. BEN-VENISTE. You've talked to your colleagues at the Park Police, and that is a uniform conclusion, is it not? Mr. ROLLA. I believe so. Mr. HINES, Yes, it is. Mr. BEN-VENISTE. So, essentially, when you were going to the White House, you were looking for the cooperation of individuals, there to help you along with your investigation to look for the lim- ited types of materials that you've described here; correct? Mr. ROLLA. That's correct. Mr. BEN-VENISTE. The only thing about this request of the Counsel's Office to the White House was that this wasn't a normal workplace at all. It was filled with lawyer's files and, indeed, the files of the lawyer to the President of the United States; correct? Mr. ROLLA. That's correct. Mr. HINES. That's correct. Mr. BEN-VENISTE. You didn't expect or would have expected that you would be able to look through all of those files; is that correct? Ms. BRAUN. That's correct. Mr. ROLLA. That's correct. Mr. BEN-VENISTE. There's no way that you wanted to do that? Ms. BRAUN. No. Mr. BEN-VENISTE. I have nothing further. (12:32:15)(tape #10117 ends) The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Hines, on the night of July 20, 1993, you got a phone call at approximately 9:45 informing you of the Foster death; is that correct? Mr. HINES. That's correct, Senator. The CHAIRMAN. Who called you from the Park Police? Mr. HINES. Lieutenant Gavin. The CHAIRMAN. Lieutenant Gavin called you and suggested that you make contact with people at the White House? Mr. HINES. Yes, he did. The CHAIRMAN. You called a Mr. Burton? Mr. HINES. Yes, I did. The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Burton is the assistant to Mr. McLarty, the Chief of Staff of the White House? Mr. HINES. That's my understanding. The CHAIRMAN. You testified in your deposition that he was obviously shocked and upset, you could tell Mr. HINES. I could tell on the phone that he was very upset. The CHAIRMAN. He told you of the close relationship-because you didn't realize it at the time-and what Mr. Foster's position was in the Administration? Mr. HINES. Yes, he did. The CHAIRMAN. His relationship with the President? Mr. HINES. Yes, he did. 193 The CHAIRMAN. Then you go on, on page 29, and you say--I want to verify whether this is correct, if your memory is still as you gave in the deposition. I will read to you. You were telling him, "One of the things we would need to do is to look into his office," meaning Mr. Foster's office, "for any evidence of motive that we might find for a suicide like a suicide note or any other items." Then you continue, "We have a certain protocol, investigation of suicides that we look for. I told him that he would need to have his offices secured for those reasons." Did you tell him that? Mr. HINES. Yes, I did, The CHAIRMAN, Is that correct? Mr. HINES. That's correct. The CHAIRMAN. You remember having told him that, you remember having testified to that in your deposition? Mr. HINES. Yes, I do. The CHAIRMAN. That is correct and true? Mr. HINES. Yes, it is. The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Chertoff. Senator Grams, excuse me. Senator GRAMS. I had one question. I'd like to make a clarification in response to some questions that Senator Dodd had asked and also Minority counsel. They tried to talk about the sealing of the office, how it all of a sudden wasn't important in your minds. I think he said by the next morning you had assessed in your opinion that this was a suicide, and sealing the office, in your mind at that time, was not as important. I think you both responded yes, although Mr. Hines had testified until this is concluded, certainly, and all evidence is in that it was a suicide, all areas should be considered as if a crime scene were involved. Would you agree with that, that even the next morning, while the assumption was this was a suicide, all the information had not been in, and so the office still should have been considered an area that should have been sealed? Mr. ROLLA. No, I don't agree with that. Senator GRAMS. You think the next morning, that the information you had was enough to say that this was a suicide?
(12:35:21) Mr. ROLLA. Well Senator GRAMS. That the office was not important and the integrity of the office was not important? Mr. ROLLA. Let me say this: Whether that was a homicide or a suicide, that wasn't a crime scene. That's a secondary scene, not a crime scene. We have no legal authority to tell anyone to seal an office. If we wanted to get in to look for evidence, we would need a search warrant, and we'd have to come up with enough probable cause to get a search warrant. The request to seal the office, which he told me-in my mind is why it's not written in the report, is an informal request for cooperation to go to the workplace. Because Mr. Foster, being who he is in the White House, we knew we were not going to be able to go in there that night. Our limited scope--again, what we want to look for, the higher-ups are going to have to be there, there's going to have to be protocol done to figure out how to go about this. No, we don't want to read every legal document, but we would like to look through obvious areas and maybe look through some 194 drawers and the briefcase for, not just a suicide note, was there anything there, other reasons, a diary, a letter, something that could have caused embarrassment, something--not looking to embarrass the man, but trying to find mental-his state of mind at the time. Senator GRAMS. I did infer that you were ordering, but I was asking if it was still important and if it was important enough to try to secure that area so it wouldn't have been "contaminated" as you stated earlier? Mr. ROLLA. No, it was important to try to maintain it. Again, if somebody went in there because they had to do things related to his job, we have no authority to keep them out. If somebody went in there and removed things, that's beyond us. Senator GRAMS. Mr. Hines, would you agree with that? Mr. HINES. Senator, I'd agree with that. The reason the examination of the room-and I'll use "examination" as opposed to "search" because we're looking for limited information that might lead us to believe that his suicide-to prove that he had intent. The reason it's important is the person's office is a work space; it tells a lot about him. So if we could normalize him and find out how he conducted his business, was he neat? If he was neat and it was messy, that would be a piece of information we'd want to know. The office itself is a piece of information, and that's why we wanted it secure. If you noticed, our guideline manual was published after this suicide, and we do say we would be very unobtrusive in searching his office, and we would have been. We're looking for a note of suicide, we're looking for any information of any difficulty he may be having that would make him so discouraged that he would take his own life. Our only factor in this investigation is that we feel that we had a complete investigation. The only problems we've had is the conduct of the examination of that office. I would like to use the term "examination" and not the term "search" because when I say "search," I'm thinking of Fourth Amendment searches and, definitely, that was not our intent in this case. Senator GRAMS. One quick question, Sergeant Braun Ms. BRAUN. Could I also answer that first question? Senator GRAMS. Sure. Ms. BRAUN. Since I am the one who spoke to Mr. Watkins' it was a request. It wasn't an order, and maybe the terms are getting all blown out of proportion. Secured-I've said it meant secured, closed, et cetera. I wanted to try to preserve that office in the state that it was. This isn't a perfect world. It didn't happen. It isn't the end of the world that it didn't happen, but, yes, that would have given us some insight, if people had not gone in and gone through the office, as to what kind of state it was in when Mr. Foster left and some indication as to his state of mind when he left. That's what I was looking for, Senator GRAMS. Do you think the White House or those that were requested did an appropriate job in making sure that was done? Evidently not. Ms. BRAUN. Like I said, it's not a perfect world. Senator GRAMS. I wanted to ask one other thing in regards to what Minority counsel had mentioned about the manual on suicide 195 printed afterwards, and the office or work space was not as important, I think, was the line of questioning he was trying to infer. Does that suicide manual refer to an office of a high-level member of the White House staff inside the White House? This is a completely unique situation, and that manual did not refer to the office of Vince Foster as not being important. Ms. BRAUN. That's correct. Senator GRAMS. Thank you. Senator DODD. Mr, Chairman, this is unclear. I thought earlier the issue of whether or not the office I think our colleague from Minnesota mentioned that the office was part of the crime scene, and there's no-you don't agree with that, that office was not in any way, whatsoever, part of a crime scene? The CHAIRMAN. I think the record is pretty clear. Senator GRAMS. We had established that before. The CHAIRMAN. The importance of the office related to, at that point in time, what appeared to be a suicide. There's no doubt. It's not a crime scene, but I think the record amply attests to that. Senator, have you concluded?
(12:40:35) Senator GRAMS. Yes, thank you. The CHAIRMAN. We have several minutes. Three minutes. Mr. Chertoff. Mr. CHERTOFF. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Major Hines, am I correct from what you just said that you regard the office itself, including where everything is placed, whether it's neat or messy, where things are arranged, what the last thing looked at on the desk was-you look at all of that information in the office as evidence; correct? Mr. HINES. That would be evidence and information that we would need in a suicide to determine a person's state of mind, and then we would ask questions. We would have to combine these with interviews with employees that he worked with. Mr. CHERTOFF. So the very condition of the office itself is an important piece of information; correct? Mr. HINES. Very important piece of information. Mr. CHERTOFF. Sergeant Braun, I take it on the day of July 20, 1993 or the night of July 20, 1993, when you asked to have the office secured, you were using your best judgment, that going in there and looking at that information and evidence was important to you; correct? Ms. BRAUN. That's correct. Mr. CHERTOFF. You didn't order anybody to do it; right? Ms. BRAUN. No, I did riot. Mr. CHERTOFF. You made a request for cooperation; correct? Ms. BRAUN. Yes, I did. Mr. CHERTOFF. Is it common in your experience when you deal with people who are witnesses or who have some involvement in an investigation that you want their cooperation? Ms. BRAUN. Yes, sir. Mr. CHERTOFF. Did Mr. Watkins indicate to you that he would refuse to cooperate? Ms. BRAUN. No. Mr. CHERTOFF. He told you he would cooperate? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. 196 Mr. CHERTOFF. The reason you wanted that office secured-not with a lot of tape, but locked so that no one could get into it-was to prevent people from rummaging, moving things, opening things, packing things away; correct? Ms. BRAUN. That is correct. Mr. CHERTOFF. You didn't get your request adhered to; isn't that also correct? Ms. BRAUN. That is correct. The CHAIRMAN. Senator Sarbanes. Senator SARBANES. Senator Kerry. OPENING COMMENTS OF SENATOR JOHN F. KERRY Senator KERRY. Let me follow up quickly on that point, if I may. It's my understanding, Ms. Braun, that you left the house at approximately 11 p.m., 11:10? Ms. BRAUN. Yes, sir. Senator KERRY. The President of the United States had arrived? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. Senator FERRY. There was Secret Service everywhere? Ms. BRAUN. There was one on the steps, and then I think there was one outside, Senator KERRY. You never mentioned anything to them about sealing the office? Ms. BRAUN. No, I did not. Senator KERRY. The place was more crowded than ever at that point in time? Ms. BRAUN. It was slightly more crowded, yes. Senator KERRY. Would you say it was a very difficult situation in which to try to talk to people and get answers, get questions? Ms. BRAUN. It made it impossible. Senator KERRY. Impossible. All right. At 11:10 you made this request of Mr. Watkins to have the office either sealed or locked; is that correct? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. Senator KERRY. At the time you made that request, you weren't thinking about national security files, were you? Ms. BRAUN. No, I was not. Senator KERRY. You weren't thinking about any files, were you? Ms, BRAUN. No. I was thinking about evidence, such as a suicide note, things that were going to indicate Mr. Foster's state of mind. Senator KERRY. In fact, it's your evidence last year, it's your evidence this year, it's your testimony in depositions repeatedly, all of you, that really what was on your minds that night was Mr. Foster's state of mind; correct? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. Senator KERRY. Correct, Mr. Rolla? Mr. ROLLA. That's correct. Senator KERRY. What consumed you as you went to this house was not the word "Whitewater." In fact, did Whitewater cross your mind at that point? Ms. BRAUN. I had never heard the word "Whitewater" before that. Mr. ROLLA. I never heard it, 197 Senator KERRY. What consumed you was the tragedy? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. Mr. ROLLA. Yes. Senator KERRY, At 11.10 you made a request not with any sense of somebody hiding something, just to secure it so if a note could be found or something existed to show state of mind, you would be able to find that? Ms. BRAUN, Yes, Senator KERRY. You are now aware that the office was, in fact, locked within half an hour; is that correct? Ms. BRAUN. No, I'm not aware of that. Senator KERRY. You're not aware of that. You don't know that the office was locked at 11:41 p.m., just 30 minutes later? Ms. BRAUN. No. Mr. ROLLA. No. Senator KERRY. Would you say if, in fact, the office was locked and there's evidence that the office was locked 30 minutes later, that that's a pretty quick response under those circumstances? Ms. BRAUN. Assuming it was, yes, Senator KERRY, Would that response satisfy you in terms of your directive? Ms. BRAUN. I guess, but knowing now that the office was entered before I made the request, it's a moot point. Senator KERRY. I understand that, but if there was no request under the circumstances of this tragedy, if someone was not at a home where they were acting out and working out their grief, is it not perfect common sense and normal human behavior that they would gravitate to the place where they worked with this person? Is there anything unusual in your mind about that in terms of human behavior?
Battlefront: Guns Roar During Cardinal's Visit Battle scenes along the fighting front in Korea. VS United Nations troops loading and firing big guns (artillery). Explosions hit nearby hillsides. Long shots of North Korean soldiers surrendering. Wounded POWs are helped along. Korean prisoners of war sit while their guns are piled next to them. Cardinal Spellman visits wounded soldiers at hospital while General Van Fleet looks on.
(23:45:47) Ms. BRAUN. I guess not. Senator KERRY. Mr. Rolla, what about you? Mr. ROLLA. No. Senator KERRY. So, before they get a request, some of his coworkers went to his office and there's evidence that Maggie Williams was sitting there crying. Does that strike you as unusual? Ms. BRAUN. No, I guess not. Senator KERRY. Now, importantly, again and again you have said the only thing on your mind was a note or state of mind; correct? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. Senator FERRY. You didn't view the house as a place of suspicion, did you, when you got there? Ms. BRAUN. No. Senator KERRY. You didn't go upstairs and search in the bathroom, in the medicine cabinet, under the pillow, on the bureau or anywhere for a note, did you? Ms. BRAUN. That would be unreasonable. Senator KERRY. Because you knew this was a place of grief, and it was a place where people were trying to give you. answers about state of mind under difficult circumstances? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. 198 Senator KERRY. Is there any reason to have believed that his office would have been a different kind of place that same night at that same time? Ms. BRAUN. I guess it didn't occur to me. What I was looking for in that office was the state it was in when he left it. Mr. ROLLA. I didn't expect anyone to be in his office. I didn't expect the office to be like his house, people gravitating, grieving. A house is more personal. We're not going to intrude on somebody's bedroom or in their house during that. Again, it's just an issue of cooperation, Senator KERRY. In point of fact, his office was not treated as if it were a house. There were only three or so people, his co-workers in that particular department or in the White House, who went into it. Isn't that accurate? Mr. ROLLA. I believe so. Senator KERRY. Now, you never told Mr. Watkins specifically that you should not prevent anybody with a right to go into the office from going in, did you? Ms. BRAUN. No. Senator KERRY. Did you ever intend that somebody who had a right to go into the office should not go into the office? Ms. BRAUN. No. Senator KERRY. You merely intended that it be basically preserved from maybe the media coming in or a whole lot of people traipsing around and disturbing the possibility of exclusively finding a note; correct? Ms. BRAUN. Right. Senator KERRY. With respect to that note, we have the actual handwritten note. Both sides have had it, and out of respect to the family, that note is not now going to be made available on these screens, nor do I think it should be, necessarily, though I might say were it visible on the screen for people to read and see, I think they would have a better understanding of what all of this is really about. It has been made public, however, its contents. Let me just ask you a couple of questions about it. Subsequent to the finding of that note, the handwriting of that note has been compared, has it not, to Vince Foster's handwriting? Ms. BRAUN. I had no involvement in that part of the investigation. Senator KERRY. Do you know that? Mr. ROLLA. Yes. Senator KERRY. Do you know that, Major? Mr. HINES. Yes, I do. Senator KERRY. You know that the finding is that this handwriting has been found to be Vince Foster's handwriting? Mr. HINES. Yes, I do. Senator KERRY. The authenticity of this note is not in doubt, is it? Mr. HINES. It's not in doubt. Senator KERRY. No one has questioned its authenticity? Mr. HINES. Not to my knowledge. Senator KERRY. Since it was handwritten and that authenticity is stated and clear and unquestioned, I might add, this note was written before Vince Foster died? 199 Mr. ROLLA. Yes, it was. Senator KERRY. Therefore, let me read the contents to you for a moment, and I want to ask you a question about it. Vince Foster wrote: Whenever I made mistakes from ignorance, inexperience, and overwork, I did not knowingly violate any law or standard of conduct. No one in the White House, to my knowledge, violated any law or standard of conduct, including any action in the Travel Office. There was no intent to benefit any individual or specific group. The FBI lied in their report to the AG. The press is covering up the illegal benefits they received from the Travel staff. The GOP has lied and misrepresented its knowledge and role and covered up a prior investigation. The Ushers Office plotted to have excessive costs incurred, taking advantage of CACI and HRC. The public will never believe the innocence of the Clintons and their loyal staff. The WSJ-standing for Wall Street Journal--editors lie without consequence. I was not meant for the job or the spotlight of public life in Washington. Here, ruining people is considered sport.
(12:50:52) Now, I ask you, as investigators for the Park Police, is there anything in that note that strikes you as a note that should not have been found or that hides something or that has any evidence whatsoever of anything that might lead somebody to an ill conclusion about Vince Foster or the Clintons? Ms. BRAUN. No. That note would have been helpful. Mr. ROLLA. No, not to me. Mr. HINES. No, not to me. The note, although not a suicide note, per se, did list some grievances he had and was a critical piece of evidence to us. Senator KERRY. You just said it would have been helpful, Ms. Braun? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. Senator KERRY. Therefore, presumably, one would have wanted to have found it sooner? Ms. BRAUN. Yes. Senator KERRY. Now, turning to your statement at some point in the deposition, Major, in answer to a question about the finding and friends on the other side of the aisle have asked you about this; they've said about this that a blind person could have found the note. In answer to the question what did he say to you-this is referring to Captain Hume about the discovery of the briefcase-he said, "Well, basically, we're talking about a briefcase. We believe it was the briefcase that was in the office the morning of the search." So, in effect, he doesn't know if it was the briefcase, but he believes it; correct? Mr. HINES. That's true. Senator KERRY. He says: Mr. Nussbaum took papers out of the briefcase and looked into it and then put it down and kicked it in the back of the room. Now, he's one of 13 people who suggests that is what happened, that he looked into it or did what he did, one of 13. Then you say- And when I talked to Captain Hume in relation to this, just in conversation, I said, 'We would have found that note because we would have been looking in the office and found his briefcase.' And he said, 'Yeah, our oldest, blindest detective would have found the note,' which is true. If it had been in the briefcase the morning we were there, and we'd have looked into it, we would have found it. 200 The point is, Major, you didn't look in, did you? Mr. HINES. No, we didn't. Senator KERRY. There were files in it; isn't that correct? Mr. HINES. My understanding. I didn't look in the briefcase. Senator KERRY. The evidence shows that the note was crimped beneath the middle flap; correct? Mr. HINES. That's the way I understand it. Senator KERRY. so if the files were in it on top of the crimp and on top of the note and you were looking down at files, you wouldn't see a note, would you? Mr. HINES, Senator Kerry, if any one of the Park Police detectives would have searched that briefcase and if we would have looked in the briefcase, we would have found the note. Senator KERRY. I agree. But they didn't, did they? Mr. HINES. We didn't look into it. Senator KERRY. Correct, and we'll get to all of that later. All I'm trying to point out is that we should not permit assumptions to be drawn here that are not based on the evidence. Mr. HINES. True. Senator KERRY. Isn't that true? Mr. HINES. Yes, sir. Senator KERRY. You know that as a detective, as an investigator? Mr. HINES. That's true. Senator KERRY. The fact here is it wasn't looked into. The facts about the state of the briefcase were, in fact, different from the phraseology that you were making your assumption on; isn't that true? Mr. HINES. That's true. Senator KERRY. So, point made, it's improbable to really say that judgment you drew is, in fact, true? Mr. HINES. That was my opinion at the time. Senator KERRY. Opinion, but not a fact. Mr. HINES. It was not a fact. Senator KERRY. Thank you very much. The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Hines, why didn't you or the Park Service look into the briefcase, the bag, Vince Foster's case? Mr. HINES. My understanding of the reason we did not look into it is we were not allowed to look into it. The CHAIRMAN. Thank you. Senator Sarbanes, do you have any other people? Senator SARBANES. Yes, I have Senator Moseley-Braun. OPENING COMMENTS OF SENATOR CAROL MOSELEY-BRAUN Senator MOSELEY-BRAUN. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, Senator Sarbanes. I am going to try to be brief so we're not here on the next anniversary and we get through this process. At the outset, I want to join my colleagues in thanking all of you for your participation here. This is the second time we've done this. This is the second year, and once again for the record, Sergeant Braun, I think we should let the conspiracy theorists know we are not related in any way. We did that last year, but I think it's important to set the record straight on that.
PRESIDENT NOVOTNY RE-ELECTED FOR CZECHOSLOVAKIA PRESIDENCY Czechoslovakian President Antonin Novotny is re-elected. Prague, Czechoslovakia MS Of the river and pan up to buildings that bank the river in Prague. GV Buildings in Prague. VS Inside Vladislav Hall the Chairman of the National Assembly, Mr Bohumil Lastov. He addresses large audience which has Prime Minister Jozef Lenart and secretary of the Central Board of the Communist Party, Jiri Hendrych in front row. GV Hall as the members of the government raise their hands in a vote. VS Newly voted president again is Antonin Novotny and he takes his vow. MS Czech. flag. VS People congratulating President Novotny. VS Massed crowds outside acclaim their new President.
PRESIDENT OF FINLAND'S 80th BIRTHDAY Helsinki, Finland L/S the presidential palace with small crowd. M/S government officials seated in room of palace. L/S government officials leaving. M/S of Finnish sentry. L/S members of Diet headed by K Fagerholm, entering building. C/U Kekkonen and President Juho Kusti Paasikivi shaking hands. C/U Paasikivi to Kekkonen. M/S members of Diet passing present around. M/S Paasikivi speaking. Various shots of flowers. C/U book of congratulatory addresses from foreign envoys. C/U President and wife reading book. M/S of various presents. C/U President and wife studying presents. M/S of flowers.
FOX HUNTING SEASON OPENS IN NORTHERN RUSSIA Hunter travelling over the snow behind his team of huskies, takes a white fox from a trap. Chukotka, Russia ( USSR ) GV. Across the snow covered steppe and a frozen lake. CU. of a trap as it is buried in the snow. CU. of the hunter pan to the trap which he is camouflaging with snow. Various shots of the hunter travelling over the snow behind his team of huskies. (dogs mushing, dog sled ) Good shots which could apply to the Arctic or any frozen region. MS. Pan with the hunter as he leaves his sleigh and takes a white fox from a trap. Various shots of men handling and grading a collection of fox furs.
EVIAN - ALGERIA CEASE FIRE TALKS BEGIN aka ALGERIA PEACE TALKS Algerian delegation arrive by helicopter as French police take security measures around hotel. Evian les Bains, France CU Sign reading "Evian les Bains" pan to security contraption across road, pan to armed French policeman standing on bridge. LS Pan across car park with parked vans, possibly police or army. MS A Swiss helicopter lands at the Hotel du Parc in Evian bringing the Algerian delegation to cease fire talks with France. MS Groups of photographers. MS Algerian Vice Premier and leader of the delegation, Belkacem Krim gets out of the helicopter. LS French troops with gun mounted on truck. LS The rest of the delegation including Mr. Saad Dahlad, Mr. Lakhdar Ben Tobball and Information Minister, Mohammed Yazid leave helicopter. MS Small crowd. MS Official cars drive away. CU Halte Police notice. Various shots, police checking vehicles on roads leading into Evian. LS Hotel du Parc. Pan across lake to French soldiers on gun placement guarding lake. MS 2nd helicopter landing. Various shots, the Algerian delegation disembark from cars and leave Evian by helicopter to return to Switzerland. Good shots of helicopter taking off.
On Preview Cassette # 95188 - Tape 2
Oil Wells
Oil Wells
Oil Wells
Oil Wells
Oil Wells
On Preview Cassette #Airplanes
On Preview Cassette #95244
On Preview Cassette #95244
On Preview Cassette #95244
On Preview Cassette #95244