Advanced Search
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 12, 1973 (2/2)
[01.14.53] ***SEE RESTRICTIONS FIELD IN RIGHTS SECTION**** Senator MONTOYA Well, Mr. Stone says $89,000, so there is conflict there--Mr. Sloan, I mean. Mr. STANS. Senator, may I say that I think Mr. Sloan's record a number of cases is that he said $81,000. I am sure that is the right one, Senator MONTOYA. And $39,000 on another occasion. Is that correct?' Mr. STANS. That is correct. Senator MONTOYA. And those are the only cash disbursements that it is your feeling went to the White House? Mr. STANS, Well, the $350,000 went to the, White House. The $75,000 that I gave to Mr. Kalmbach went for a White House purpose but I do not know that the White House ever got it. So far as I know, the $81,000 did not go to the White House, and the $39,000 did not go to the White House except, for one item,. which I have not yet told you about. On November 28, I got a call from John Dean, or it, may have been a day or two before November 28 which led to an action on November 28, saying that the $350,000 fund which had been turned over to Strachan in April had ad been depleted by $22,000 ; $22,000 had been used for some purpose, Since it was a fund for polling, I Just assumed that it was for polling. He said that he would like very much to have that fund restored to $350,000 so that if he ever had to account, for it, it would be intact. And as a matter of fact, along about, that time, we began discussions about whether or not the $350,000 might be given to the finance committee and taken into its receipts. But, he indicated it was quite important that he have $22,000 to restore the fund. So I gave him $22,000 out of the money that I had received through Tim Babcock, on November 28. He sent Gordon Strachan of the White House staff over to the office to pick it, up. Now, the other $17,000 that I had received from Tim Babcock I gave to Fred LaRue as a, payment on account of the $30,000 that he had given me to give back to the Philippine national. So that $39,000 was expended and those transactions have all been reported to the General Accounting Office in our last report. Mr. BARKER. - Senator Montoya, Senator Montoya, for the record, I might, indicate that in Mr. Dash's questioning on June 6 of Mr. Sloan at page 1254, he refers to the $81,000 figure, consisting of $18,000 and $63,000. Senator MONTOYA. I received that information from the transcript of the interview which indicates the sum of $89,000, so there must have been a typographical error but on page 4 of the interview of which we have a record it, indicates $89,000. Now, let's go back to [he cashier's check that, Mr. Dahlberg got in Miami and brought to Washington and then went back to Miami and was cashed. -Now was the cashier's check for $25,000, was that in the name of Mr. Dahlberg? Mr. STANS. Yes, it was on a Miami bank payable to Kenneth Dahlberg. Senator MONTOYA. Did he endorse it? Mr. STANS. Yes, he did. He endorsed it Just before he gave it, to me. Senator MONTOYA. Who cashed it? Mr. STANS. Well, I don't know for, a fact who cashed it except that I gave it to Mr. Sloan at the first, opportunity. Mr. Sloan discussed it 'with our general counsel Mr. Liddy, and -according to Mr. Sloan, Mr. Liddy undertook to cash it. Senator MONTOYA. That is all, Mr. Chairman. Senator ERVIN. It is sort of a warm day and the witness has been on the Stand for a long time. It is apparent we can't finish today so 'Without objection on the part of some member of the committee we Will stand in recess until 10 o'clock tomorrow morning, Thank you. [01.19.40--Senators, photographers, others, stand to leave] [00.19.45--MacNEILL in studio] MacNEILL states that STANS will return to the stand tomorrow, to be questioned about the degree of his ignorance about how the money he raised was spent. Probably also comment about STANS' assertion that he complained to the White House about the cost of the campaign. States that STANS' testimony leads logically to next witness, Deputy Campaign Director Jeb MAGRUDER. STANS said that MAGRUDER was the one to authorize sums of money paid to LIDDY, and with LIDDY taking the Fifth, STANS' testimony is important. [01.20.41]
Fountains
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 12, 1973 (2/2)
[01.20.41--LEHRER in studio] ***SEE RESTRICTIONS FIELD IN RIGHTS AREA*** LEHRER states that STANS will not answer questions pertaining to his pending indictment, and that the committee has been careful to avoid asking such questions. However, the staff feels that things have gone well in spite of the agreement to limit questioning. LEHRER introduces interview by Peter KAYE of Rufus EDMISTEN, deputy counsel. [01.21.08--KAYE with EDMISTEN in vacated committe chamber] KAYE asks if EDMISTEN felt circumscribed in his questioning by virtue of the fact of STANS' pending indictment EDMISTEN says he would characterize it more as restraint, and rightly so, as not to prejudice the judicial system KAYE asks about pre-interviewing by the committee staff, and if there were any surprises with STANS. EDMISTEN says he won't comment, but perhaps there were??? but there will be the opportunity for further corroboration by more witnesses. KAYE asks about plans to call MITCHELL and Dick WHITNEY to corroborate the issue of the MEMO which STANS denied knowing about (the reserve fund of the Commerce Department) EDMISTEN states that the committee staff plans to follow up all investigative leads KAYE states that STANS had been billed as the first of the big-name witnesses, and he seemed to acquit himself well with his testimony, Asks how EDMISTEN feels about the testimony EDMISTEN states that he doesn't feel the staff really even got started today, he covered the ground that he could cover, and the Senators will have more questions tomorrow. [01.23.45--LEHRER in studio] LEHRER states that the mention by EDMISTEN of a memo from MAGRUDER to MITCHELL that said STANS had a million-dollar political fund at the Commerce Department was a surprise to many. STANS denied the existence of the fund, and LEHRER states that it was a surprise to many in the audience that EDMISTEN dropped the line of questioning. [01.24.11--MacNEILL] MacNEILL states that if STANS finishes in time, MAGRUDER is expected to take stand the next day, and may potentially resolve some disputed issues, such as the reason MAGRUDER gave to Hugh SLOAN as justification to pay cash to LIDDY. MAGRUDER may, conversely, testify like others have, that he was just following orders from someone higher in rank. LEHRER calls on Alan BARTH, D.C. journalist, and Bill GREENHALGH, assoc. dean of Georgetown University Law School, as guest commentators. LEHRER asks GREENHALGH whether it's true that the hearings will prejudice STANS' trial in New York. GREENHALGH. states that he thinks a juror would be hard pressed to find prejudice based on the proceedings today. The witness appeared precise and cooperative. If anything, STANS' appearance on TV seems as if it would become a credit and not a liability. BARTH says he hopes that the days hearings will lay anxieties to rest that a congressional investigation automatically prejudices judicial trials, and that STANS' testimony was beneficial to both the committee and to STANS. States that the counsel's argument ought instead to be made to the court if they later feel that the course of the hearings did prejudice his case, but the committee had exercised great restraint despite the graveness of its task to investigate the operation of the executive branch under the system of checks and balances. LEHRER asks GREENHALGH if this bodes for more legalism in the future in the hearings, and the issue of the rights of potential criminal defendants will become a greater issue. GREENHALGH says that this is true, and that as yet, there has not been an invocation of the fifth amendment, leading him to believe there is a great deal of behind the scenes effort to establish ground rules for questioning. States that he is impressed, and he is not sure when a witness will choose to take the fifth. Continues to state that he was irritated by AGNEW'S statement that the ERVIN hearings were a miscarriage of justice because the concepts of Due Process, Notice, Counsel, and Self-Incrimination have been scrupulously followed, and witnesses have been respected in their rights. LEHRER states that Senators ERVIN and BAKER used quotations and generous words to address PORTER at the conclusion of his testimony, and sent him on his way with thanks. LEHRER offers that PORTER'S discussion of his character and some flaws in it was dramatic, personal, and frank, and very sad. STANS was self-assured as a man who had been at the top levels of power for a long time, but PORTER appeared to be in awe of even the mention of President NIXON, which was one of the reasons he followed orders to do what he did (PERJURY). STANS confessed to nothing, and the contrast was striking, and LEHRER wonders what quotation will be offered by Senator ERVIN when STANS finishes tomorrow. LEHRER signs off [01.30.47--title screen "SENATE HEARINGS ON CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES", sponsor credits, NPACT ID--PBS NETWORK ID] [01.31.26--TAPE OUT]
Parachute jump over Dominican Republic
Preview Cassette 220368 Parachute jump over Dominican Republic The first parajump over Dominican Republic soil by the 82nd Airborne Division, U.S. Army-- jump over San Isidro, DR, Sunday May 30, 1965. This was a practice jump and not combat-inspired.
U.S. Marines, Dominican Revolution
Preview Cassette 220370 U.S. Marines (8th Marine Regiment) manned checkpoints in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic during the April-June 1965 Revolution. Shots of Marines stopping cars at checkpoint in the U.S. Corridor Zone... two marines relax next to their armed machine gun bunker... contrast shot of expensive homes in the area and teh scenic beach front south of the city.
Ride through rebel territory
Preview Cassette 220368 Ride through rebel territory , Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
Jeep ride, Santo Domingo
Preview Cassette 220368 Jeep ride, Santo Domingo US military
Ride through rebel territory,
Preview Cassette 220368 Ride through rebel territory, Santo Domingo Dominican Republic
1965 Preakness
Sequence of racetrack activity at Pimlico Racetrack, Baltimore, MD. Shots of horses leaving paddock and entering track. Shots of horses leaving starting gate. Shots of horses down stretch and past finish line. Misc shots of horses trotting past grandstand before race. Sequence of Willie Shoemaker... on mount... trotting past grandstand... weighing in on scale... dismounting, etc.
Executive offices - Washington monument
Winter - Lincoln Memorial
Washington and Jefferson monuments
Lesser Yellowlegs
TAPE 1 Lesser Yellowlegs preem, scratch Lesser Yellowlegs feed on land
Lesser Yellowlegs
TAPE 1 Lesser Yellowlegs feed on land
Solitary Sandpiper
TAPE 1 Solitary Sandpiper feeding on land Solitary Sandpiper eating big earthworm Spotted Sandpiper feeding Spotted Sandpiper feeding and calling Spotted Sandpipers courtship displays Spotted Sandpiper feeding Spotted Sandpiper feeding Spotted Sandpiper preening
Eastern Kingbird
TAPE 1 Eastern Kingbird
Baltimore Oriole
TAPE 1 Female Baltimore Oriole perched
Baltimore Oriole
TAPE 1 Female Baltimore Oriole perched
Song Sparrow
TAPE 1 Male Song Sparrow sing
Mockingbird
TAPE 1 Mockingbird
Cardinal
TAPE 1 Male Cardinal in mesquite tree
Savannah Sparrow
TAPE 1 Savannah Sparrow perched
Common Sacksnipe
TAPE 1 Common Sacksnipe
Spotted Sandpiper
TAPE 1 Spotted Sandpiper in winter feeding