Advanced Search
Terror In Texas: Sniper Kills 15; 33 Wounded
From the tower of the University of Texas in Austin, 24 year-old student Charles Whitman sprays bullets, killing a total of 15 people while wounding 33. Austin police, after shooting Whitman, discover he has also killed his wife and mother, bringing the death total to 15. Establishing shot of the clock tower on the grounds at the University of Texas in Austin. MS - Student appears to be shot and every one is on their knees because the shots being fired are coming from the clock tower. Medium - CUS - Students carrying a female student away to get her help. MS - Students running on the streets looking for cover. MS - Male student being carried away by other male students. CUS - An armored truck pulls up, rear door is ajar. MS - Students crouched behind parked cars. Medium LS - Students rescuing other students that have been shot and lay on the ground, one of the injured appears to be lifeless (dead). LS - Clock tower. High Angle Shot - Throngs appear on the University's square. High Angle Shot - Ambulance taking away the injured. CUS - The assault rifles and guns the shooter used. MS - Students returning to class.
Luci And Pat: Preview
A pre-wedding reception at the Georgetown home of Ambassador W. Averell Harriman highlights a week of festivities for Luci Baines Johnson and Patrick Nugent. The party formally introduces the couple to Washington's diplomatic corps. A still shot of the engagement picture of Luci Baines Johnson, 19, and Patrick John Nugent, 23 runs over the newsreel introduction. CU Luci and Patrick's wedding invitation. MS - Exterior - The White House, summertime shot. Medium LS - Exterior shot of the Catholic church, Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington DC where the high profile wedding will take place. MS - Patrick John Nugent, Ambassador W. Averell Harriman, Luci Baines Johnson, Lady Bird Johnson (First Lady) and Mrs. Averell Harriman standing outside the Ambassador's home in Georgetown, Washington DC. CUS - Ambassador W. Averell Harriman, Luci Baines Johnson and Lady Bird (First Lady) Johnson. CUS - Inside the home as guests form a receiving line to formally introduce Luci Baines Johnson and Patrick Nugent to the Washington DC political forces. MS - President Lyndon Baines Johnson disembarking from his limousine shaking hands with Ambassador W. Averell Harriman. High Angle Shot - A very political pre-wedding reception at the Georgetown home of Ambassador W. Harriman. There's a lot of political mingling. CUS - Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, DC. This is the venue where the high-profile wedding will take place on August 6, 1966. Wide Angle Shot - Interior of the church.
Paris Fashions
Kooky new fashions are displayed in Paris. They include metallic dresses which resemble suits of armor worn by Knights of Old. The chain mail (chainmail) styles come complete with huge metal earrings. Even hats carry the motif which may bring back King Arthur's roundtable! Models are wearing dresses made out of either a metallic plastic or a lightweight aluminum. MS - Two models admiring each other's shiny dresses made in tones of either silver or gold metallic. One of the model s dress looks like it's made out of silver credit cards and the other model is wearing a sleeveless knit, v-cut dress that looks like a disco ball. MS - The two ladies are looking at a coat made out of geometric shapes of metallic, cut pieces of plastic or lightweight aluminum, either way it will not keep you warm. MS - The two gals walk up to a mannequin and they are looking at the style of her dress and head gear. They remove the headgear from the mannequin and place it on the model. It's made from geometric shapes cut out of plastic or leather that cover the eyes. They also have shaded lens inserted into the holes, so that they may double for sunglasses.
Swim Meet: New Record!
In Los Angeles, four-event Olympic gold medalist Don Schollander breaks his own world record in the 200 Meter Men's Freestyle. His new record: 1 minute, 57 seconds. 16 year old Pokey Watson ties the world record, winning the Women's 200-Meter Freestyle.... High Angle Shot At a swim meet, swimmers are in the pool warming up while a crowd of people sit and watch. CUS - Fans and other swimmers sitting in the stands. MS - Women dive in for the 200 meter race. CUS - Pokey Watson wins and at the same time breaks a world record in the women's freestyle. Low Angle Shot - People sitting in the stands. MS - The men take their positions on the diving blocks. MS - They re off to a good start. MS - The winner of the men's 200 meter freestyle race is Don Schollander. Both he and Pokey Watson break and tie world records for the 200 meter - Freestyle - 1 minute and 57 seconds.
Watergate Impeachment Hearings House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974.
Watergate Impeachment Hearings House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974.
Watergate Impeachment Hearings House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974.
[00.48.18] The CHAIRMAN. I recognize the gentleman from Mississippi I overlooked, Mr. Lott. Mr. LOTT. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I know the hour is late, I will be brief. I would like to associate myself with the remarks of Mr. Mayne, and speak briefly in support of the motion to strike by Mr. Sandman. I Oink that, he probably did not intend necessarily to offer motions to strike on each amendment, but I think it has been clearly demonstrated here by what has been said. that we do have a need to see what the specifics are so that we can debate and agree, if possible, on what will be included in the articles.Now, we have already pointed out earlier that there, was a mistake the first allegation in support of this section. And I have another that I could speak to with regard to the President's giving false and misleading statements to Petersen on March 21, but I think enough has been said about this. I think now that the point has been made very clearly by the last few speakers, on both sides of the aisle, that we do need to find some, way to come, up with the particulars and I urge the committee to go ahead and get on with their vote on the motion to strike and make some termination as to what we can do or some way that we can find to be more particular so that we can debate the real issues, the real facts that have been asking for an opportunity to discuss. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The CHAIRMAN. I recognize the gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Latta. Mr. LATTA. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As a reward for your pa patience, I shall not take my full 5 minutes. I take this time to ask a couple of questions of Mr. Doar. If we do not strike this item, it is your intention, then, to leave it in these general terms and to go to the statements of information for the details? Mr. DOAR. I'm sorry, I didn't understand the question. Mr. LATTA. Is it your intention if the article--item is not stricken as proposed by Mr. Sandman. is it your intention then to go to the statements of information for the details that will have to be spelled out specifically in the charge the President? Mr. DOAR. No; Mr. Latta, it -would not be my intention to do that. Mr. LATTA. Where will you (yet the information? Mr. DOAR. You would have the statements in a report that would go along with the article to the floor. and in the report yon would be keyed to the summary of information that you were furnished last week, and that in turn would also be keyed back to the, statements of information, but what you would have, as I would envision it, you would have a report that was maybe 15, 20 pages long that would summarize these facts, these ultimate facts. and relevant facts, and that would be keyed if someone wanted further information to the summary of information that, was about 150 pages long and had it all keyed to statements of information where you could see the documentary--- , the testimony, if you needed to see them. Mr. LATTA. Where would the President have to go to find out the charges being made against him specifically? Mr. DOAR. Well, the President would have the article or articles of impeachment. MR. LATTA. Which would be general. Mr. DOAR. Which would be general. The President would have the report of the committee. The President would have the summary of information, and the President, would have the statements of information. Mr. LATTA. He would have to go to all of those? Mr. DOAR. Well it isn't a question of reading them all. They, would all be. keyed so you could got from one to the other very easily. It is not--it is not a difficult job of getting in and out of this material if you have the proper Index. Mr. LATTA. SO what you are saying, then, you are going to have,' report in addition to the statements of information. Mr. DOAR. Well, there would be a committee report. That is my understanding what the chairman has said. Mr. LATTA. And you wouldn't be incorporating all 38 or 39 statements of information in that report. Mr. DOAR. Oh, no. Mr. LATTA. But the President, would still have to go to those statements of information to get the details of the charges being mad against him specifically. Mr. DOAR. Not the details of the charges, but if he had Mr. LATTA. Let's get the specifics. Mr. DOAR. The specifics would be in the--there would be more specifics in the report. If he was--you could be more Specific if you looked at the summary of information that we furnished last week Mr. LATTA. Well, then, the question is how would the President knows the charges being made against him if we left this charge "making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States". Now. will you just outline how he would know what those charges are so he can defend himself against them? Mr. DOAR. Well--- Mr. LATTA. He would go then to the report from this document Mr. DOAR. He would go to the report, and if the report--then he would look at the summary of information. That is the document we furnished, one notebook. Then in the one notebook that is the statement of information, and he could go to that and the actual testimony, for example, or the statement that a person made, or the press release, or whatever else was relevant on that subject and then--that is not unusual with respect to modern civil or criminal practice Mr. LATTA. It might not be unusual, but in cases, in criminal court these days we don't 38 or 39 volumes of statements of information and I would just like the American people to know what we are talking about. And this- [00.54.26--to demonstrate, piles the STATEMENTS OF INFORMATION, EACH THE SIZE OF A PHONEBOOK, on top of each other on the table] [00.54.56--laughter as LATTA FINISHES his demonstration]
Watergate Impeachment Hearings. House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974
[00.59.53] Mr. OWENS. Mr. Chairman, I rise, in opposition to the motion to strike and I would like to refer back to the statements earlier of the gentleman from California, Mr. Wiggins, who, in debating this same motion was just to strike subsection 1 of this article to the effect that the President has made false and misleading statements to investigative officers and others. Mr. Wiggins again spoke of the celebrated June 22 statement by the President, in his press conference. to the, effect that there was no White House and no Committee for the Re-Election of the President involvement in the. burglary which had taken place 5 days earlier and he said that there was no clear and convincing evidence as to when the policy, this policy of obstruction of the investigation which is at, the, heart of the. Sarbanes substitute, that there is no clear and convincing evidence as to when the policy came into effect. I would like to state and then take you to several items of evidence which all Members are aware of, that that policy clearly came into effect sometime between the 17th of June and this statement by the President, on the 22d of June. I think the strongest, case can be made from inferences and from a reasonable application of what all Congressmen know is the procedure in all of Our officers. All the President's men. in essence, are aware from evidence that the Members are aware of. were aware prior to June 22 and several days prior. as a matter of fact, that Mr. Hunt then technically on the rolls of the White House. had been involved in the, burglary and that Mr. Liddy then, and who -was continuing to serve as chief counsel to the. Committee for the Re-Election of the President, everyone knew, that those two men had been involved in the burglary prior to this time and we know in our offices, I would say members of the committee, that, we, follow those things and it is impossible. to believe that the President could have, been aware of the burglary which we, know he -was and to have been aware that it could have involved people, in his campaign committee Or in the White House and not to have asked the question, but out, of the, President's own words we know that by June 22 he was aware Of Mr. Hunt's and Mr. Liddy's involvement, that in Mr. Colson's testimony to this committee be clearly indicated that on the 19th, 2 days after the burglary, that, he had a conversation with the President and the President's response, Was to throw--as reported to Mr. Colson--was to have thrown an ashtray across the, room in disgust when he learned that, the Committee for the Re-Election of the President was involved in that burglary, and we have the Presidents own memo to himself as has been Called earlier on the night of June 20 when he indicates that in a conversation With Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Mitchell had informed him that personnel from the committee had been involved in the burglary. And we know from Mr.--from the President's statement of May 22, 1973, in reference back to the days immediately following the Watergate burglary, when he says within a few days the name of Mr. Hunt Surfaced in connection with the investigation and he, uses that in reference to the time that he--that the CIA involvement became known to him which clearly indicates and is tied in prior to June 22. So clearly the President has indicated in the evidence available to this committee, and it has got to be clear and convincing, that he did know that Mr. Hunt had been involved, again technically on the rolls of the White House, and that Mr. Liddy, still the chief counsel to the Committee for the Re-Election of the President, had been involved, both members had been involved, and yet with that background and with that in his conscience, with that in his mind--- [01.04.03--TAPE OUT]
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974 (2/2)
*See information in RIGHTS field before using* [01.09.36--DUKE, LEHRER in studio] DUKE says its been a long day for committee, to be back tomorrow. Says there will be more "TEST VOTES", and that it's clear that the REPUBLICAN defenders of NIXON will try to use any tactics available to derail the proceedings, but it seems like a losing cause. LEHRER wonders whether the tactic of using strike motions to force debate on every section of the article will be continued. Indications from Reps. SANDMAN, WIGGINS, that such would happen, or possibly they will consider the point made and not belabor the losing cause. DUKE introduces LEWIS on screen LEWIS says that Chairman RODINO has committed to fairness, and thus has not cracked down on the delaying tactics, at risk of having up to 27 hours of debate on the striking motions alone. Says that the lines are hoding fast in spite of the debate, ironically with REPUBLICAN Rep. FROEHLICH going from the "strike" side to the side supporting the ARTICLE as drafted. Says that the REPUBLICANS may relent and give up the tactics, which are at a standoff currently. [LEHRER in studio] LEHRER characterizes the situation as a delicate balance for the REPUBLICANS and for Chairman RODINO with regard to how long the debate should be allowed to stretch, with neither side wanting to be seen as extreme. LEWIS says there may be a CAUCUS in the morning to resolve the procedural questions. But it depends if the REPUBLICANS are scoring political points in their speeches. If they continue to convince other HOUSE members and the public that the proceedings are unfair to NIXON, they may continue to gear up for the FLOOR VOTE. DUKE says it's significant that there is a bipartisan coalition for impeachment LEWIS agrees, and saying that this is a "test vote" on impeachment, and that the final tally is likely to be similar to the 27-11 one on this motion. p[01.15.05]
The Fabulous 60s
RESEARCHERS PLEASE SEE RESTRICTIONS
CBS News Special: The Italians
DO NOT SELL. "Freely adapted from the book by Luigi Barzini" A B&W documentary of Italian life: city and country, peasants and politicians, arts and humanities.
CBS Pilot: The Tim Conway Show
DO NOT SELL. Starring Tim Conway and Joe Flynn. Created by Kenneth Solms and Gail Parent. Produced by Burt Nodella. Written by Laryy Gelbart. Directed by Bruce Bilsen. Tim and Joe are two mixed-up blokes who start their own airline with an old wartime bomber.
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974 (2/2)
*See information in RIGHTS field before using* [01.22.22] VAN ALSTYNE disagrees, saying that the essential decisin of the coalition is that there is enough evidence to convince a reasonable person that NIXON did commit certain acts, and that the 27 members on the impeachment side trust John DOAR'S counsel that due process is served by the ARTICLE as drafted, if these members have put aside their disagreements on which particular acts and allegations are relevant for one vote, there is no reason why the coalition cannot hold together. DIAMOND says that he was impressed by the way the PROCEDURAL question of SPECIFICITY raised debate that caused members to fall out on lines of SUBSTANCE with respect to impeachment Says that the committee debate is crucial because the large number of hardcore, PRO-IMPEACHMENT, liberal DEMOCRATS must compromise with more moderate members to draft a bill of impeachment that moderates and REPUBLICANS in the HOUSE will be willing to support. Likewise, the smaller core of intensely PRO-NIXON members is pursuing a strategy of tying all substantive matters to questions of DUE PROCESS, characterizing the IMPEACHMENT as akin to criminal proceeding, to make their case. [RETURN to LEWIS at CAPITOL--standing in a now-empty corridor] LEWIS says to expect more haggling and procedural debates, but possibly one side will relent and a vote on the first ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT may be reached by the end of the day. [DUKE/LEHRER in studio, LEHRER standing at "scoreboard"] DUKE: the day's hearings have clearly shown a majority coalition for impeachment. LEHRER: wonders aloud what changes are required on the scoreboard. 23 definite Ayes, 11 Noes, two "maybe's", says that extrapolating the vote, he can move rep's FISH and RAILSBACK to the AYE category and FROEHLICH to the NO category. DUKE argues that FROEHLICH has indicated he could vote for other ARTICLES. LEHRER agrees and moves FROEHLICH photo a bit away from the rest of the no voters. DUKE signs off [01.29.45--PBS ID] [01.29.52--TAPE OUT]
CBS PIlot: Missy's Men
DO NOT SELL. Starring Dwayne Hickman, Jack Sheldon, Dan Travanty (Daniel J. Travanty) and Tracey Lee as "Missy". Directed by William Russell. The story of three young male working professionals and their adopted Chinese child, working and living in San Francisco. Can't tell if they are brothers or angles in a gay love triangle. Very interesting material although the writing and general subject matter is schmaltzy and lighter than sponge cake.
US Navy: Men With Green Faces
"Functions of the Navy's Frogmen Commandos, the SEALs. The excitement of jungle patrols, the rigors of their training and a cross-section of life in this unique organization." Excellent look into the rigorous, five year training of a United States Navy SEAL: Opening montage of a limited SEAL squadron on a fact-finding, Vietnamese style excursion through tall yellow grass: CU's of a SEAL putting green and black greasepaint on the face of another SEAL; MS's of the squad in greasepaint and camouflage sailing quietly along an irrigation canal in a rubber raft; MS's of the men walking through the grass, using hand signals to alert and talk amongst themselves. CU's of a drill instructor scowling and hollering at his platoon in classic drill sergeant jargon; CU's of the stern-faced soldiers. MS's of the soldiers enduring exhaustive training regimen: push-ups, pull-ups, sit-ups, cargo nets, airplane dips, tires, calisthenics, swings, rope crawls, etc. MS's and CU's of recruits wearing helmets and life vests, lifting a rubber raft overhead and carrying it away while chanting the SEAL mantra, "Hoo ah... Hoo ah." MS's and CU's of SEAL trainees going through water exercises, some involving SCUBA gear, others not: soldiers roll off of a speeding speedboat, then are picked up later on by grabbing a tow rope and hoisted aboard the speeding boat; good underwater shots of SCUBA exercises; soldiers leap through an open hatch of a helicopter's belly and fall to the water below. Paratrooper training montage: CU's of faces, CU's of feet and MS's of soldiers as they hop from the top of a scaffold and slide down a gurney line to the ground (they are in harnesses). Great low angle MS's and tight LS's of soldiers attached to open parachute canopies and dangling from the top of a tall scaffold; they are then let go, falling to the ground below. Then the soldiers do the real thing: low, high and level angle shots of the trainees leaping from a carrier, freefalling, opening chute, and landing. MS montage of a SEAL squadron on a fact-finding practice mission. They wear the paint and camo fatigues, carrying M-16 assault rifles. Vietnam style excursion again. MS's and CU's of trainees firing their guns on ambush targets. MS's and CU's of an officer schooling a trainee in the art of hand to hand combat (flipping, striking, reversing moves, etc.). MS's of soldiers quickly rappelling a steep slope. MS's of soldiers in a classroom (wearing dress fatigues), learning Vietnamese from a native female teacher. CU of an American flag flying off a docked river patrol boat, cut to MS of SEALs boarding boat. Good CU's and MS's of soldiers wading through a shallow river (they wear combat gear and hoist their weapons high). Tight LS's of a patrol boat sailing on river. MS's of boat gunners loading M-60's. Good objective and subjective MS's of a helicopter crew flying over Vietnam countryside. Excellent MS's and tight LS's of gunners and deckhands firing on an unseen target near the coast. Great high angle LS's of rockets being deployed from helicopters, exploding on land. Good MS's of helicopter gunners firing on countryside. MS's and CU's of SEALs in navy whites during a small outdoor awards ceremony (Purple Hearts included). Interesting shots of navy wives watching on from the stands.
Illinois Voters Test
ON PREVIEW CASSETTE# 210780 THERE ARE THREE REELS TO THIS FILM. THEY ARE LABELED A, B AND C. NOTE THAT REEL "C" IS A COMPILATION REEL OF BOTH "A" AND "B". This is essentially a quiz show testing one's knowledge about voting rules and regulations in the state of Illinois. Reel "A": Opening montage: MS's of running political candidates meeting their constituents in both public and formal events (good shots of handshaking both the eager and not-so eager); MS of Robert Kennedy speaking at a podium on behalf of a political candidate; CU of a young Walter Mondale; CU and MS of Gerald Ford speaking to a large boardroom; MS of two men putting a bumper sticker on a car; rallys, crowds (including one for Bobby Kennedy, all sorts of banners and placards), press opportunities, kissing babies (not literally) and so on. Cut to three staged MS's of everyday folk voicing their dissatisfaction with the political process: an older man hoo-hawing to the camera, then a younger woman getting her hair done in a beauty salon (saying her vote doesn't matter/count), and a priest (says, "Amen"). Onwards to a polling place montage: MS's of a man entering a voting booth, CU of an election lever being pulled, etc. Then MS's of a middle-aged man wearing a beret and speed-riding (fast motion) a bicycle to the polling place before they close down; CU of the man asking the camera, "Am I too late to vote?" MS, pan right, of new citizens taking the oath of citizenship (all dressed well, looking happy). MS's and CU's of a roomful of people taking a written exam. Cut to CU's of the Declaration of Independence and the famous masthead, "We the People of the United States..." MS's of a Lakota Sioux Indian powwow; held outdoors on a bright sunny afternoon, the players in full regalia including war bonnets and bone necklaces. Cut to MS's of the Suffrage and Civil Rights movements as they relate to voting privileges. MS's and tight LS's of American troops in Vietnam (marching through plains and jungles on way to combat). MS's of switchboard phone operators at the Board of Elections doing their job. Tight LS of a commercial airplane taking off. MS of an old man lying in a hospital bed and being attended to by a nurse. CU's of switchboard patch bay. CU of a woman's hand, a wedding ring being slipped onto ring finger. CU of a newspaper, the pages of the front section being flipped. CU's and MS's of folks talking on a telephone (including a funny shot of a man scratching and misaligning a really bad toupe). CU of an electorate lever being pulled in a booth. REEL "A" ENDS AT 600'. Reel "B": MS of a man wearing a hardhat and waiting in line for his turn in a voting booth. MS of a goofy British-looking cad stepping from a voting booth while eating and pouring salt on a three minute egg. MS's and CU's of a man going through the voting process: registering with the polling judges at a table inside the polling place; being handed a write-in ballot; entering a booth and filling it out. Good CU of the ballot, the candidates clearly marked. CU of the tip of a pencil breaking. MS of amn taking a pen from his breast of suitcoat. CU of amn filling in the name of a write-in candidate for state senate. MS of man putting ballot into ballot box. Cut to funny, fast-motion reverse action of the entire process, leading to the very beginning. CU's and ECU's of boxes on ballot being filled. CU of a hand flipping switches of an electronic voting booth. CU's of various information systems circa mid-1960's, including 1" machines and analogue processors. Portrait stills of Thomas Jefferson, John Quincy Adams and Rutherford B. Hayes. MS of Franklin D. Roosevelt seated at a desk, signing legislature; CU of his signature as he signs something rather. Cut to a montage of the Selective Service Draft: MS's of a man being blindfolded in front of Congress, then pulling numbers from a large glass jar; CU of a young woman watching on, her eyes bugging from her head. CU (MS?) of a man reading the Daily News outdoors (tagline reads, "Today! Selective Service Registration Oct 16, 194?"). Tight LS's of soldiers boarding a large boat. CU of switches being flipped in an electronic voting booth. CU's of "scarred" ballots, write-in ballots where the markings did not follow procedure. MS, pan left, of new citizens taking the oath of citizenship (male and female, young and old candidates). Cut to great MS of a mother and her son sitting in a room before taking the oath-- the boy has a small American flag in his hand. REEL "B" ENDS AT 830'. REEL "C" IS A COMPILATION REEL OF REELS "A" AND "B".
CBS Fall Preview 1973-1974
DO NOT SELL.
CBS: All in the Family- #224 Maude
DO NOT SELL. An episode of the legendary CBS comedy series, "All in the Family". Features guest appearance by Maude (Bea Arthur).
McHale's Navy: The McHale Mob
DO NOT SELL. The "McHale Mob" episode of the long-running CBS tv comedy, "McHale's Navy".
McHale's Navy: Comrades of PT 73
DO NOT SELL. The "Comrades of PT 73" episode of the long-running CBS tv comedy series, "McHale's Navy".
McHale's Navy: Ensign Parker, ESP
DO NOT SELL. The "Ensign Parker, ESP" episode of the long-running CBS tv comedy, "McHale's Navy".
McHale's Navy: Evil Eye Parker
DO NOT SELL. The "Evil Eye Parker" episode of the long-running CBS tv comedy series, "McHale's Navy".
Snow mountains, clouds, old man
Brandt's Cormorant
Master 2110, Tape 1 Very Brief MS of Brand'ts cormorant (Phalacrocorax penicillatus) diving under the surface of the water (fishing)
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 27, 1974
[00.06.35--cut to committee room] The CHAIRMAN. The committee will come to order. 'The Chair wishes to announce that pursuant to the policy adopted when we considered the rule of procedure for this debate, that it contemplated that there be general debate for a period not to exceed ours and that it -was understood as agreed policy that the balance the time for the consideration of amendments to the articles would consume more than 20 hours. The Chair -wishes to point out that having commenced with the consideration of the articles yesterday for purposes of amendment, 12 hours have already been consumed of that time. However, as the committee certainly understands, the committee can extend time for consideration of the articles for purposes of amendment until -we have resolved the entire question. The Chair would like to state that in the light of some of the motions to strike -which are presently before the Chair, the Chair intends to recognize after a motion to strike has been proffered as an amendment to article I and to each paragraph thereafter that after an hour's debate has expired, the Chair is going to entertain a motion to move the question and that the question will then be in order. Mr. HUTCHINSON. Will the chairman yield? The CHAIRMAN. I recognize the gentleman from Michigan. Mr. HUTCHINSON. I thank the chairman for yielding. I Would not want there to be any misunderstanding about the time limited for debate. MY recollection is, Mr. Chairman, that in earlier version of the rule which was adopted, there was a 20-hour limitation for amendment but that in the final version the wording was worked around the concept of the 5-minute rule and the provision does not limit debate to a total of 20 hours, and that while there was an expression of hope that it could be accomplished in that length of time, still if 12 hours have already been consumed and we have not yet disposed of article I, it becomes very obvious, Mr. Chairman. that it will be necessary to consume more than 20 hours to handle these articles and in order to extend, beyond 20 hours, Mr. Chairman, I do not think it would take any formal action of the committee to extend the time for debate beyond that 20 hours. With regard to limiting debate on a motion to strike to 1 hour Mr. Chairman, an I would indicate that I certainly would interpose an objection to that. Mr. SANDMAN. Mr. Chairman, reserving the right to object- The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Sandman. Mr. SANDMAN. [continuing]. And I shall not object, I would like to say, and I hope that others will agree who took the position I did yesterday that the argument, was exhausted as far as I am concerned yesterday on the articles of impeachment along the line that I suggested. A vote has been taken. There. are amendments on the desk that have my name on them and I would like to withdraw those because they are aimed at the same point of law that we discussed at great length yesterday. It is my hope, Mr. Chairman, that we will be able to proceed with article I with the degree of discipline that existed yesterday and with last night, no doubt continuing today. There is no way that the outcome of this vote is going to be changed by debate and 1, therefore, hope that; we can with dispatch cover the Sarbanes substitute and there will be no objections from me, no amendments from me, nor will there be any motions to strike from me. [00.11.44]