Advanced Search
Vietnam Heroes: "Screaming Eagles" And Green Berets
"Operation Hawthorne", 40 miles north of Pleiku in Vietnam, rescues the men of an Army Special Forces camp, under heavy attack by the Vietcong. Meanwhile, at the White House, Lieutenant Charles Williams receives the Medal of Honor from President Johnson for heroism in a similar operation, defending a "Green Beret" camp. LS of firing of cannons, shooting of assault riffles, soldiers loading field guns, lots of smoke, soldiers fighting a battle. Soilders loading a cannon. A platoon of soldiers kneeling in a ditch with automatic riffles. CUS - Soldier firing his automatic riffle. Soldier firing a grenade launcher. A line of soldiers throwing hand grenades. CUS of a caucasian soilder talking into a radio from a ditch. From a platoon, two soldiers firing their riffles and slowly walking into the jungle. Shots are fired as they are covered by white smoke the soldiers advance. Washington, DC./ White House: Lieutenant Charles Williams with his family receiving the Medal of Honor from President Johnson. Members of the Armed forces or Congress sit watching. MC of Lieutenant Charles's daughter sitting on the floor in a fluffy white or light pink gown. CUS - President Johnson placing the medal around Lieutenant Williams neck. Camera pans - Lieutenant Williams wife and children as President Johnson adjusts his medal on his neck.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973
[00.35.52] Senator ERVIN. Rule 25 of the committee, rules provides that any person who is the subject of an investigation and public hearings may submit to the chairman questions in writing for cross-examination the witnesses. Their formulation and admissibility shall be decided by the committee in accordance with Rule 24. [brief view of SLOAN'S WIFE sitting with counsel behind SLOAN.] Rule 24 gives the committee the power to rephrase the questions that are asked. Mr. Robert Barker, who is counsel for Mr. Stans, has contacted the committee and asked the committee to put the following questions to Mr. Sloan. Mr. Sloan, you have testified that you have checked -with Mr. Stans about certain payments to Mr. Porter. -Now, this is the first question Mr. Barker wants us to ask you: When did this occur? Mr. SLOAN. My best, recollection, Senator, would have been on the occasion of the first request in the post-April 7 period for funds. I could not place it in a precise date. Senator ERVIN. The second question is what amounts, if any, were involved? Mr. SLOAN. I do not believe that we even mentioned the precise dollar amount. I think it, was an expression of concern on my part, whether this was continued, to continue in light of both my understanding and Secretary Stans' understanding that he was no longer to receive funds. I am not even sure the dollar figure came up. Senator ERVIN. Was; anyone else present tit, the time you checked with Mr. Stans about the payments to Mr. Porter? Mr. SLOAN. No sir. Senator ERVIN. Did you check with Mr. Stans as to any payment to either Liddy or Porter after the time you checked about Magruder's authority to authorize an $83,000 payment to Liddy? Mr. SLOAN. No, sir. I do not believe I ever checked with him on a dollar amount. It was purely the authority. Senator ERVIN. Do you recall what amount of money was made to Porter after April 7, 1972? Mr. SLOAN. Senator, my best recollection of that figure was approximately $6,000. I understand Mr. Porter's general recollection to the General Accounting Office was $11,000. I have no reason to dispute that figure. Senator ERVIN. There is another question which Mr. Barker asked which really is four questions and relates to payments that you made to Mr. Kalmbach. The first, is: Did You make any payments to Mr. Kalmbach after February 15, 1972? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir. Senator ERVIN. The second subdivision of this question is: If so, what was the amount, of these payments? Mr. SLOAN. I am really not sure, Senator. They were not tremendous amounts, There may have been two or three at the most. Senator ERVIN. The third subdivision of the question is: What were these payments for, these payments to Mr. Kalmbach after February 15, 1972? Mr. SLOAN. I have no idea, Senator. Senator ERVIN. The fourth subdivision of the question is: Were they disclosed On periodic summaries after February 15, 1972? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir, all the funds I handled were covered in that report to Secretary Stans. Senator ERVIN. They were? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir. Senator ERVIN. Now, as I understand you, after you had prepared what the committee called a summation Of all of these disbursements, you gave that to Secretary Stans? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir, I did. Senator ERVIN. Did you make more than one copy? Mr. SLOAN. I may have at the time it was typed, but in the light of-in my understanding, more than a. single copy, whatever copies, would have been destroyed at the same time its the book, yes, sir Senator ERVIN. And after you had imparted the sum total of what your record disclosed in this statement that you furnished to Mr. Stans, you destroyed your record? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir. Senator ERVIN. Now, 37011 testified, as I recall, that you had put rather a--rather you testified on the examination of Senator Gurney Senator Weicker and Senator Montoya about the conversation you had -with Mr. Haldeman. Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir. Senator ERVIN. When did that occur? Mr. Mr. SLOAN. I probably could find a precise date. I neglected to look it up last night and I apologize. -My best, recollection would be toward the end of January or early February, somewhere in that point. Senator ERVIN. This year? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir, it was while I was a consultant at the committee. Senator ERVIN. Where did this occur? Mr. SLOAN. In Mr. Haldeman's office at, the White House. Senator ERVIN. Then you stated Mi. Haldeman told you he had nothing to do with the Watergate affair? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir. Senator ERVIN. But he told you that he knew about the, Segretti matter and that when the Segretti matter was revealed, that it would be understandable? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir, or words to that effect. Senator ERVIN. Well, that occurred in January of this year? Mr. SLOAN. January or early February. Senator ERVIN, So far as you know, has Mr. Haldeman ever revealed anything about the Segretti matter to the general public or anybody else? Mr. SLOAN. -Not that I am aware of, sir. Senator ERVIN. Do you know what the expression "laundering checks" means? Mr. SLOAN. What expression? Senator ERVIN. "Laundering checks." Mr. SLOAN. I read the term numerous times, Senator. I do not have any precise knowledge of what that term is. [00.41.31]
Jewel Fashions
Jewel Fashions "A unique fashion show while cruising around Manhattan Island. Models wear a million dollars worth of diamonds from Cartier, Harry Winston, Van Cleaf and Arpels. " Nice TLS Circle Line XII cruise boat docked in harbor, setting sun in BG. MS female models wearing glittery diamond earrings or necklaces passing camera, boarding boat. LS Circle Line cruise ship pulling away from pier. TLS crowd on boat. Low angle MCU middle-aged white female model wearing diamond earrings & necklace shielding sun from eyes with hand. CU young white female wearing diamond earrings. MCU model wearing diamond bracelet. MS/CUs several models wearing expensive diamond jewelry.
Commonwealth Track Meet
Commonwealth Track Meet "At Los Angeles Coliseum, in U.S. - British Commonwealth Track and Field Meet, Jim Ryun, 20 year old University of Kansas sophomore sets world's record in the 1500 meters, 3:33.1, defeating Kenya's Kipchoque Keino. Ryun already holds world's record in mile. " High angle LS participants marching on track during pre-race ceremony. Panning high angle LS/TLSs track race featuring Kenyan KIPCHOQUE KEINO and American JIM RYUN; Jim Ryun takes lead, leaving Kipchoque Keino in the dust. Jim Ryun crosses finish line, wins, breaking previous world record time. MS Kipchoque Keino and Jim Ryun walking after race, Keino slapping Ryun's back in congratulations.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973
[00.41.31] Senator ERVIN. Do you know whether any of the checks that were received by the committee were sent out to some person in Bethesda or Silver Spring Or somewhere in the environs of Washington to be converted into cash and returned to the committee? Mr. SLOAN. Senator, I believe what, you are referring to there is, in the early period 'Mr. Magruder asked me to set up essentially what was an agency account with Mr. Henry Buchanan, a CPA, who was doing work for us. I understood that a certain portion of this money, and I think it was something in the neighborhood of $2,000 a month, went to supplement, the salary of Ken Rietz. I do not know what the balance went for. As I recall, it was quite an argument at that point and I have forgotten the participants or where the final authority came from, but I recall objecting to the concept of a, separate fund out of the hands of the finance committee. Senator ERVIN. Am I correct in inferring from your testimony that the objections of the disbursements of the funds which you paid out under the authority of -Mr. Kalmbach , Mr. Mitchell, and Mr. Magruder was determined by either them or the recipient, of those, funds? Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir. Senator ERVIN-. And not by Mr. Stans or you? Mr. SLOAN, Not by myself and to the best of my knowledge not, by Mr. Stans. Senator ERVIN-. And so those are the men, or the recipients of those funds, who would be the people who would know what was done. with those funds. Mr. SLOAN. Yes. sir: I would say with one, exception Mr. Stans and were involved in 'the Lankler item of $50,000 that was a finance matter and the Clement Stone matter as well, but the other matters that would be correct. [00.43.28--Classic ERVIN] Senator ERVIN. Well, I can't give any retroactive advice to the Men who were responsible for this disbursing funds for political purposes and concealing the objectives of the disbursements, but I can suggest to future people who attempt to do that that when they do, they may be either rightly or wrongly judged by the standards set out in the Scriptures where it says "Men love darkness rather than light because their deeds are evil." Senator BAKER.. Mr. Chairman. Senator ERVIN. Senator Baker. Senator BAKER. I have one additional question or line of questions and I apologize to the committee and 'Mr. Sloan, but when you have a good witness YOU try to get as much information as you can. In reviewing the testimony that you have given to the committee, and in anticipating some of the testimony I expect, we may receive from other witnesses later, I have tried to establish areas where there might be potential conflicts or where there might be elements of uncertainty or incomplete explanation of either statements of people or the contents of documents. Now, with that preamble, let me point to two or three things I would like to ask you about and, frankly, I confess in advance I am asking you for subjective answers. I think it, is impossible for you to give an Objective answer. I am concerned at this point for a clear definition of the quality and the scope of your warnings or your expressions of concern to Mr. Chapin, Mr. Ehrlichman, Mr. Haldeman, Mr. Mitchell. I have only a sketchy picture of what was said and, therefore all I can ask you to do in addition to what you have already said is give me some appraisal of the quality of that warning. Was it a Stern, intensive sort of thing or was it a casual expression of vague uneasiness? Between those two, if you can help me on this scale of subjectivity, I would be grateful. Mr. SLOAN. Senator, with regard to the Chapin and Ehrlichman matters I think they essentially fall in the same category, As I have tried to point out, I have a very great, deal of trouble putting together in my precise state of mind what factors were affecting that at that point in time. The nature of those meetings were, as in the case of Mr. Haldeman, extremely cordial. They are men I consider my friends. We talked over a range of other things. The introduction in each case was about families, vacations, the social amenities and so forth. I would say probably just, because it is not my character I do not believe, that I made the hard sell anywhere. I think I said I just think there is a problem. I do not believe at that point in time, and I am not sure of the precise sequence, in fact, whether Mr. Magruder made his approach to me, so what I am saying, there were certainly no--it was not a warning in it sense of substantive information. I think it was an expression of personal concern that perhaps maybe I, because Of how I felt, assumed that these gentlemen would intuitively pick that up and perhaps run with the ball from there. I cannot characterize these meetings as something where I said, gee, you guys have to do something about this specific problem or I am going to do something about it. It was not that, kind of proposition, it was very low keyed. [00.47.23]
The Running of the Bulls
The Running of the Bulls "Bulls racing through narrow streets with amateur bullfights risking life and limb to get close to them. Home-made matadors get trampled and bowled over in Plaza DeToros. " LS/TLSs of the Running of the Bulls in Pamplona, men running, some getting trampled by bulls or their fellow running man. Nice TLS steady stream of men running into tunnel leading into plaza de toros (bullfighting stadium). TLS/LSs people & bulls running into bullfighting ring (plaza de toros). Panning TLS man hooked on horns of racing bull being dragged through ring. TLS crowd of men clustered together, many sitting in plaza de toros. Stunning high angle LS bull leaping into throng of men seated in bullfighting ring, the bull trampling & stomping on the men before running off. Panning TLS/LSs young men getting hooked & gored & knocked on the ground by racing bulls.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973
[00.47.23] Senator BAKER. I am sure you understand why I asked that question. Mr. SLOAN. Yes, Sir. Senator BAKER. Because at some future time this committee. presumably will have to judge the likelihood or the appropriateness of the conduct of others in response to the information you imparted, your frame of mind, your attitude, and the quality and scope of your warnings or admonitions. It is important for me to know that quality, the subjective quality of concern as it relates to the future testimony of, say, Mr. Chapin, Mr. Ehrlichman, Mr. Haldeman, Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Stans. Mr. SLOAN. Yes, sir, I understand. Senator BAKER. Does the description which you have given us, which obviously is subject to many interpretations, that of the general type warning, that all of these meetings or were there variations of it, say, with Mr. Mitchell or with Mr. Ehrlichman or Mr. Haldeman? Mr. SLOAN. Of course, in the case of Mr. Haldeman, this was sort of after the fact. It wasn't, a warning situation at all, it was merely: It is all over, I am going MY way, I want to pass through on the way out to be sure that you understand why I did what I have done. As far as I was concerned somebody somewhere had already made their decision between me and how they were going to go in this matter, which was a moot point. So I don't--he for instance, in this meeting discussed Mr. Chapin, what a difficult decision it had been for him, a man who had been very close to the power, to the President personally, which I had not been, to make the decision to go into the private sector. We discussed this in terms of the proper age for a young man who is not, because of being in an appointed position with a partisan administration, is not a career government official, you have to make a personal decision at, some point where you are going to provide in the long term for your family. Senator BAKER. I think I understand your point of view and just, for the sake of time I am going to ask one final question that, is even more patently subjective, but the committee will weigh it for whatever it is worth, if you can answer it. The questions I have asked so far on this subject, obviously lead to one master question, and that is, in your judgment, did the men to whom you talked, Mr. Chapin, Mr. Ehrlichman, Mr. Haldeman, Mr. Stans, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Magruder, did the men to whom you talked respond in your judgement in an appropriate way to the quality or the intensity of your admonition, warning or conversation? Mr. SLOAN. Senator, if I could I would answer that question in terms of how problems within a campaign are normally addressed. I mean it is not only for me but it was quite clear potentially there was great damage coming to the campaign just by nothing else, guilt by association, because the campaign is the very logical place to look for suspects in a case of bugging of the opposing party's headquarters. But the thing that disturbed me was not, the negative response but lack of positive response. In a sense that if you had a problem about gift, tax You get all of the appropriate people on the committee together and sit down and talk about it. As far as I know, in view of the knowledge I had about the money I could not believe that, at some point in time he, didn't have a situation develop where more than two people get together in a room at any one, time. This creates, a climate as you go through this, perhaps suspect what might be going on. I don't know 'Whether that is characterized very well but it did not seem to be a normal response given the nature of the problem. Senator BAKER. I am not sure-your response is ,it least as good as my question. We will lot it stay there, Mr. Sloan, you dropped one little pearl there that, I can't, resist picking when you said the bugging of each other's headquarters, do you have any information about that? Mr. SLOAN. No, sir. That was a slip. I have no knowledge of that. [Laughter.] Senator BAKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Senator ERVIN. Senator Gurney. Senator GURNEY. No. Senator ERVIN. Senator Montoya. Senator MONTOYA. No questions. Senator ERVIN. Senator Weicker. Senator WEICKER. No questions. Senator ERVIN. Then, I would suggest that we close with letting counsel and minority counsel ask quite a few questions that they may have. [00.51.55]
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973
[00.58.52] AFTERNOON SESSION, THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 1973 Senator ERVIN. The committee will Come to order. I understand the first witness will be Mr. Porter. We intend to recall Mr. Porter at a later date and it is the hope of the chairman that, at this time, we will only go Into questions about his knowledge or lack of knowledge of the budgeting and break-in of the Watergate and any alleged attempts to cover up that episode. The counsel will call the witness. Mr. DASH. Mr. Herbert Porter, will you please take the witness chair? senator ERVIN. Mr. Porter, will you stand up and rise your right hand? [PORTER standing to be sworn in, right hand raised] Do you swear that, the evidence, which you shall give to the Senate, Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities shall be the truth the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? Mr. PORTER. I do; so help me God. Mr. DASH. Mr. Chairman, Mr. David Dorsen, assistant chief counsel, will ask the opening questions of this witness. [IT IS VERY STRANGE HOW MUCH DORSEN RESEMBLES SAM DASH] Mr. DORSEN. Mr. Porter, could you please give your full name and address" TESTIMONY OF HERBERT LLOYD PORTER, ACCOMPANIED BY CHARLES B. MURRAY, COUNSEL Mr. PORTER. Yes, sir; my name is Herbert Lloyd Porter. My Present address is 32451 Mediterranean Drive, Laguna Niguel, Calif. Mr. DORSEN. Mr. Porter, I see you are represented by counsel. Could counsel please identify himself? Mr. MURRAY. Charles B. Murray Is my name, sir. Mr. DORSEN. Mr. Porter, I understand that you have a brief Opening statement Would you please make it at this time? Mr. PORTER. Thank you. My full name is Herbert Lloyd Porter. I am also known as "Bart" Porter. I was born and reared in California. I served 2 years as an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps, after which I spent 7 1/2 years in the marketing of data processing computers and software. Having never been involved in any political campaign or other political activity, I was both honored and excited at the opportunity to help in some way toward the reelection of Richard Nixon to a second term in the White House. Prior to joining the Committee for the Re-Election of the President in May 1971, I served a brief period in the White House, working in the office of the Director of Communications Herbert G. Klein. My function at the Committee for, the Re-Election of the President was to organize the surrogate candidate program. My title was director of scheduling. I was also responsible, for organizing all celebrities, entertainers, and athletes for the campaign. Almost all my time, while at the Committee for the Re-Election of the President, was spent organizing and directing the activities of these several groups. Stories have appeared in both newspapers and magazines mentioning my name in connection with what has come to be known as Watergate. A few of these stories have been fairly accurate, some half true, while others have been totally false. The record will show that I have made no comments to any reporters or newsmen over the past several months, This may or may not have been wise on my part, but I was trying the best I knew how to protect my wife and my three children from the consequences of any excess publicity. I have cooperated fully with both the Federal prosecutors and members of the investigative staff of this committee, and I have made full disclosure to them. I also wish to state that in cooperating with both the Federal prosecutors and this committee, I did so voluntarily and, in the case of the Federal prosecutors, I appeared at my own request, At no time did I ever seek immunity from either group, nor did I authorize my lawyer to do so. I have made no deals. I have, agreed only to tell the truth. I will answer all questions, put to me by this committee regarding testimony heretofore given by me. At no time did I ever have, any intention of covering up a criminal act. At no time did I knowingly engage in any coverup of the Watergate burglary. I had no prior knowledge of the Watergate burglary. And up to this very moment, I have no knowledge of the involvement of others. I have been guilty of a, deep sense of loyalty to the President of the United States. The facts speak for themselves. Finally, may I say that this whole affair air has had a most, devastating effect on my personal life. Because of the unfavorable publicity, I have been terminated from a lucrative position in private industry, a fact which, in turn, has caused me to forfeit, at substantial loss, the purchase of a new home in California, where I was born and planned to live, This is my situation, Mr. Chairman. I am now ready to answer any and all questions to the best of my ability. Mr. DORSEN. Mr. Porter, in your opening statement------ [01.04.11--TAPE OUT]
Watergate Hearings - Testimony of Herbert Porter, June 7, 1973.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973. Testimony of Herbert Porter.
Record Breaker
Record Breaker "Flying' Jim Ryun breaks his own world record for the mile, shaving two-tenths of a second for a 3:51.1 performance. His final quarter mile of 53.5 seconds is what does it. " High angle LS/TLSs athlete JIM RYUN running, winning, breaking world record at AAU National Championships. MS judge in tower, banner reading "Bulova Phototimer." Interestingly enough, Jim Ryun is a sincerely devout Christian, who went to become a Congressman for the Second Congressional District of Kansas.
Watergate Hearings - Testimony of Herbert Porter, June 7, 1973.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973. Testimony of Herbert Porter.
Operation "Provide Promise" (Bosnian relief efforts)
04:00:00 -- MS of interview with Sergeant Major Sue Wilson, U.S. Army, senior non-commissioned officer at Camp Pleso in Zagreb. 04:09:45 -- LS and MS of shore patrol searching people at checkpoints. 04:13:50 -- MS of interview with First Sergeant Phyllis M. Smith, U.S. Army, first sergeant of Headquarters Company. 04:22:10 -- CU of United Nations flag. 04:22:15 -- MS and LS of troops using recreational facilitities and the post exchange (store).
Watergate Hearings - Testimony of Herbert Porter, June 7, 1973.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973. Testimony of Herbert Porter.
Watergate Hearings - Testimony of Herbert Porter, June 7, 1973.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973. Testimony of Herbert Porter.
Watergate Hearings - Testimony of Herbert Porter, June 7, 1973.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973. Testimony of Herbert Porter.
Watergate Hearings - Testimony of Herbert Porter, June 7, 1973.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973. Testimony of Herbert Porter.
Hoop Champs: Texas Western Upsets Kentucky
The crowd at College Park, Maryland, see a David come out of the west to slay an eastern Goliath. Texas Western wins the National Collegiate Basketball Championship by downing the highly favored Kentucky team 72 to 65. Nobody paid much attention to Texas Western when they entered the tournament, but there was tumult and shouting when the team won the first major sport title Texas Western had ever won. College Park, Maryland High Angle Wide Shot - Throngs of Basketball fans all looking down at the basketball court at the University of Maryland, the game is in play. High Angle Shot - Texas has the ball and in no time they bring it down to Kentucky's basket and scores some points. MS - No 42, Pat Riley lobs the ball and it falls into the basket scoring some points for Kentucky. CUS - Coaches. High Angle Shot - Texas has the ball on court, they bounce it back and forth among the Texas players. One of the players lobs the ball right into the basket. Texas scores and tallies up more points. Texas played with 7 men during the whole game. High Angle Shot - No 10 Kentucky has the basketball and out of nowhere comes a Texas player. He steels the ball, runs right over to the basket and scores. MS - No 45, Kentucky has the ball in the second half and scores. MS - No 10, Kentucky has the ball. He tries to make the basket and hits the rim. Texas No 23, Dave Lattin, picks up the ball and backs up teammate to tap the ball in the basket. Wide Angle Shot - Packed stadium with basketball fans. MS - Texas Western has the ball and sinks it in for some points and wins the game. CU - Happy, smiling hand waving college basketball players of Texas Western celebrating their win. Camera swings to Kentucky and the basketball players are sitting there on the bench with their heads hanging and looking disappointed. CUS - Texas Western receiving the winning plaque. Texas 72 to Kentucky 65.
HISTORIC MEETING Pope and Canterbury Seek Christian Unity
A day of historic import is written on the Church calendar at Vatican City. Dr. Arthur Michael Ramsey, Archbishop of Canterbury, and Pope Paul VI confer in the Sistine Chapel on steps that might be taken to bring Roman Catholics and Anglicans closer together. The Vatican, Rome, Italy Exterior of the Vatican. Another view of the Vatican with fountain. Inside the Sistine Chapel is Dr. Arthur Michael Ramsey, Archbishop of Canterbury and Pope Paul VI. A Crucifix hanging below Michelangelo's painting. MS - Pope Paul VI and Dr. Arthur M Ramsey. MS - Profile of Pope Paul VI. MS - Pope Paul VI and Dr. Arthur Michael Ramsey hug in peace, exchange "kiss of peace". Michelangelo frescoes on wall behind them, and a few cut-always to those paintings.and then they shake hands.
AINT LOVE GRAND British Panda Arrives To Meet Soviet Mate
Not since Romeo and Juliet has there been such a love story. Crowds greet Chi Chi who arrives in Moscow to meet An An, a Russian man about town and her groom. The only two pandas outside of Red China, Chi Chi and An An will make zoologist happy if they become proud parents. Russia, Moscow Arrival of a British airliner taxing on the landing strip in a Russian airport. A crowd of people running towards the air plane that just landed. Airport workers rolling the covered stairs to the airplane. A huge box "BEA CARGO" and on top of the box "Chi-Chi". London to Moscow. A glass panel front of the crate and behind that you can see Chi-Chi the panda. A bamboo plant for Chi-Chi. Moscow zoo. An-An the boy panda, sitting on his rear end playing with his paws. Cute. Russian and British news media photographers. An-An pacing in his cage and he does a summer sult. Cute, cute and more cute but the cage is depressing compaired next to today's standards.
Watergate Hearings - Testimony of Herbert Porter, June 7, 1973.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, June 7, 1973. Testimony of Herbert Porter.
OPERAS NEW HOME Famed Met Moving To Cultural Center
New York's Metropolitan Opera has something to sing about -- a spanking new home in Lincoln Center, the city's new cultural hub. For 83 years the Met has been housed in a massive Victorian structure further south -- a forbidding pile that has echoed to the world's greatest voices. Now, just as singers have become streamlined so has the Opera House, now ready to carry on a great old tradition in new surroundings. New York, NY Exterior of Metropolitan Opera's brand new home in Lincoln Center in New York City. Arched paned glass windows. water fountain. Two Metropolitan Opera's curators looking over the interior of the new opera house. Inside the theatre itself a look at the balconies. High Angle Shot - Workmen still plastering walls and installing steps inside the theatre. Sitting area with new seats Low Angle Shot - Austrian crystal chandlers. Wide Angle Shot - Overall shot of the balconies, and there are lots of them.
Curtain Raiser For Indianapolis 500
The nation's top drivers compete in the Phoenix 150 mile race, a warm-up for the Indianapolis Five Hundred Classic. Jim McElreath gets home first with an average of close to 99 miles an hour. He will be one of the stars at Indianapolis when that race is sent to theatres over closed circuit television. Jimmy Bryan Championship Race. This is a curtain raiser for the Indy-500 and the nations top drivers are here. Mario Andretti and AJ Foyt. Jim McElreath sitting in his race car getting last minute adjustments done. Roger Ward in car. People sitting and standing in the stands. Race starter waves his flag and the cars are off and running. High Angle Shot the race cars speeding around the track. More footage of the cars speeding around the track but this time there's a back drop of the high hills in the background. he checker flag is being waved and they have a winner of the race, Jim McElreath. Jim McElreath standing in the winners circle with his wife smiling away and they give each other a small peck (kiss),
FRONT LINE ACTION Marine Officer Reportds Battle With Vietcong
A dramatic description from the scene of a recent U.S. Marine search and clear mission by Marine Lieut. Dick Neckline. Under murderous Vietcong fire the young Marine never pauses as he describes the action of flushing a Vietcong regiment from its jungle caves and fastnesses. Truly Heroic! In a Vietnamese village a Marine Officer, Lieut. Dick Nicklin standing with a microphone in hand describing the action of the soldiers, the sounds gun fire of attacking North Vietnamese. He reports there is going be a very methodical search of the Vietnamese grass huts that are behind him. Marines walking very slow up to a grass hut. Vietnamese woman holding her baby on her hip. A soldier is speaking with his commanding officer, pointing. Soldiers are moving around looking for young men who can be members of the Vietcong and for tunnels and caves. In the distance you can see the exploitations from motor fire and you can hear the sound of the bullets and the rapid firing of a machine gun. You can see something is on fire in the distance. Two soldiers step into the frame and for now they are just observing. You hear this long round of machine gun fire, you see a soldier running through the trees and then you see a Vietnam home hit by motor fire, and burst into flames. Marine Officer, Lieut. Dick Nicklin explains how the soldiers thought that they were in a rest period with nothing much happening when all hell broke loose 10-minutes ago.
MRS GANDHI AND LBJ Begin Talks Seeking Wider Understanding
With a flashback to her lonely isolation in high office in India, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi is shown being received in Washington by President Johnson. A red carpet state visit that brings out the pomp and circumstance of the nation's capital. India Indira Gandhi sitting looking over some papers. Camera Pans - A picture of Indira Gandhi's father Nehru. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi speaking with three other women. High Angle Shot - A busy street in India, a large crowd of people walking around. and Indira Gandhi standing in the midst of the crowd. Indian gentlemen come up to Indira Gandhi to speak with her. Indira Gandhi being lead and protected by her political bodyguards. Indira Gandhi sitting in her garden reading a book when she's greeted by her two Golden Retrievers. High Angle Shot - Indira Gandhi petting her one Golden Retriever and the other one is barking at the camera man. Washington DC Exterior shot of the White House. People queuing up. On the White House grounds stands Lady Bird, Indira Gandhi, President Johnson and other dignitaries welcoming Indira Gandhi to Washington DC. Ceremonies and Military Review. Military officers standing on the balcony of the White House. President Lyndon B Johnson walking with his arm through the Prime Minister s arm, Indira Gandhi on the White House lawn, military band playing music in the background, "no audio of music playing"