Advanced Search
Raptors - Osprey
TAPE 1 03:04:38 2 Ospreys on tree stump 03:06:12 Ospreys flying 03:06:22 Ospreys on tree limb 03:07:39 Ospreys on snag
Raptors - Great Grey Owl
TAPE 1: 03:09:18 Great Grey Owl perched 03:09:27 Owl on tree stump, CU, zoom 03:12:07 Owl flying down for mole and then missing 03:12:46 On tree snag, CU 03:14:20 Owl on limb, shaking feathers 03:14:56 On limb, shaking feathers 03:16:04 Owl on limb, preening feathers 03:18:03 CU of owl on limb 03:19:55 Owl on limb preening 03:20:36 CU of owl on limb TAPE 2: 03:21:30 Great Grey Owl CU 03:23:09 Owl perched, zoom 03:23:36 Yawning Great Grey Owl 03:24:05 Great Grey Owl looking about 03:25:18 Owl stretching its wing 03:25:54 CU of owl stretching both wings 03:27:21 Owl preening CU 03:28:13 Zoom in of owl 03:28:43 Owl falling asleep
Raptors - Red Tailed Hawk
TAPE 2 03:31:43 CU of Red-Tailed Hawk
Raptors - Barred Owl
TAPE 2 03:34:13 Baby Barred Owl, CU of bill, feet, and stretched wings
Raptors - Great Horned Owl
TAPE 2 03:40:25 Great Horned Owl CU
Raptors - Barred Owl
TAPE 2 03:42:26 Barred Owl CU
Raptors - Screech Owl
TAPE 2 03:44:25 Screech Owl, Red Phase CU
Raptors - Kestrel
TAPE 2 03:48:56 Male Kestrel or Sparrow Hawk CU
Sea Birds - Hornd Puffin
(Tape 1) 12:05:24 Horned Puffin in nest hole and on cliff
Sea Birds - Horned Puffin
(Tape 1) 12:12:47 Horned Puffin preening
Sea Birds - Horned Puffin
(Tape 1) CU of Horned Puffin
Sea Birds - Crested Auklet
(Tape 1) 12:19:22 Crested Auklet
Sea Birds - Tufted Puffin
(Tape 1) 12:22:31 Tufted Puffin
Sea Birds - Least Auklet
(Tape 1) Least Auklets on rocks, then flying
Sea Birds -Thick Billed Murre
(Tape 1) Thick-Billed Murres flying
Sea Birds - Least Auklet
(Tape 1) Least Auklets flying
Sea Birds - Thick Billed Murre
(Tape 1) Thick-Billed Murres swimming
Sea Birds - Parakeet Auklet
(Tape 1) Parakeet Auklets swimming
Sea Birds - Murre
(Tape 1) Cliffs and Murres
Sea Birds - Red Legged Kittiwake Gull
(Tape 1) Red-Legged Kittiwake Gull
Sea Birds - Thick Billed and Common Murre
(Tape 1) 12:29:14 Thick-Billed Murres & Common Murres 12:29:47 Murres preening
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974 (2/2)
[01.16.00] *See information in RIGHTS field before using* [Chairman RODINO with Reps. RAILSBACK, SARBANES, DRINAN, others] DUKE/LEHRER v.o. discuss the conflict between the members over specificity, LEHRER saying it could become very drawn out and difficult. [01.18.55--GAVEL to order] The CHAIRMAN. The committee will be in order.I recognize the gentlelady from Texas, Ms. Jordan, for 5 minutes. Thank Ms. JORDAN. Thankl you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, this committee has spent 2 days receiving and listening to very eloquent arguments. We talked about the Constitution I and we talked about the Serious nature of the impeachment process and all which -was said, we were telling the truth. We believed what we were talking about. Now, Mr. Chairman, this committee is called upon to get to the matter of the consideration of articles of impeachment. It apparently is very difficult for the committee to translate its views of the Constitution into the realities of the impeachment provisions. It is understandable that this committee would have proceeding difficulties, because this is an unfamiliar and strange procedure. But, some of the arguments which were offered earlier today by some members of this committee in my judgment are phantom arguments, bottomless arguments. Due process. If we have not afforded the President of the United States due process as we have proceeded through this impeachment inquiry, then there is no due process to be found anywhere. Well, what did we do? The Judiciary Committee under all of the historical precedents available does not have to allow counsel to the President to participate in its proceedings, but this committee, because of its grace, because it wanted to be fair, because of its interest in due process allowed, suffered, if you will, counsel to the President to sit in these proceedings every day. He was present. Was he gagged? Was he silent? No, because this Judiciary Committee cast a rule which allowed the President's counsel to speak. Now, one might say, well, certainly that is minimal due proem. All I am saying is that the committee was under no compulsion to do that, but voted to do it. So, the President's counsel was here and received every item of information this committee received. The President's counsel suggested witnesses be wanted called and heard by this committee. They were all called. They were all heard. The President's counsel was afforded the right to cross-examine witnesses. I Now, I know that our rules disallowed cross-examination on said question. But, those of you who know of the capacities and abilities of Mr. St. Clair would certainly say that be cross-examined the witnesses who appeared before this committee. What else did he do? He submitted to this committee a reply brief: in addition to making and oral argument in response to all of the' material which this committee had received. Now. we have board a lot today about specificity, about our being so general that no one would be able to answer it, that the President would not be advised of his rights, and that therefore would not be able to answer or prepare for his defense. Well, Mr. St. Clair felt that the case presented before this committee was specific enough for him to file a reply brief and to engage in oral argument, both before this committee. The subpenas. We were very reluctant to issue a subpena to the president of the United States. But the President asked us for additional time to respond to our first subpena and we said we want you, Mr. President, to have due process, so additional time is yours. And we gave him that time. Due process? Due process tripled. Due process quadrupled. We did that. The President knows the case which has been heard before this committee. The President's counsel knows the case which has been heard before this committee. It is a useless argument to say that what We Would do is to throw 38 or 39 books at the House and say, you find the offenses with which the President is charged, and say the same thing to the President. We talked about a report and we say that the report will be filed along with the bill of impeachment, resolution of impeachment. That report will be filed and it will contain the rather detailed specific particularized information so that no one can question whether the President has been advised of the allegations against him. The CHAIRMAN. The time of gentlelady has expired. MS. JORDAN. Thank you. [01.26.15]
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 26, 1974 (1/2)
[00.02.00--Opens with view of the legal staff, Hillary RODHAM is visible seated behind John DOAR--unfortunately, in closer shots of DOAR, her face is just out of frame] Testimony given by Special Committee Counsel John Doar and Assistant Mr. Jenner. Questions and Remarks given by Congressmen Wiliam S. Cohen (R-Maine), David Dennis (R-Indiana), Ray Thorton (D- Arkansas), Hamilton Fish Jr. (R-New York), and Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzmann (D-New York), Transcription of this clip is available upon request.
Liberace Show #64, Master 512
Liberace Show # 64 (CHRISTMAS SHOW)