Advanced Search
Winter Scenics
(Tape Two) Snow melted by warmth of tree trunk 05:41:11 Frost crystals on window, gray metallic, closer look 05:42:19 Kopy's Pond in winter - scenic, pond surrounded by trees 05:42:45 Maple tree in winter
Tourist
(Tape Two) People photographing elk in Yellowstone National Park, cars parked on side of road, globs of photographers and gear set up, panning
Spider Web
(Tape Two) Spider web with dew drops, shown from different angles, zoomed
Mammoth Hot Springs
(Tape Two) Yellowstone's Mammoth Hot Springs, puffy white and orange streaked mountain with smoke coming off the top of it
August 2, 1994 - Part 3
(12:29:24) Hearing resumes: The CHAIRMAN. The Committee will resume. Let me invite everyone to be seated. We have about 45 minutes before we must recess ,-Or the caucus luncheon meetings. 358 Senator Boxer. OPENING COMMENTS OF SENATOR BARBARA BOXER Senator BOXER. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Steiner, I hope you're going to keep your idealism and Your belief that serving Government is a noble thing to do. When I look at you and I --you remind me of two people that I have great re- spect for who are motivated, I believe, in the right way and care as you do, and that's my son and my daughter. One's a lawyer and the other one's in the movie business and we know there's a defi- nite connection between the two of those. What I guess I need to ask you is about your diary. My daughter' kept a diary. Once we sat down and went through this diary and I remember stating well, you didn't explain it to me exactly this, way and she said, "Mom, this is a diary." This is a diary. And as, I go through your diary, I notice there are certain words there that are kind of exaggerations. They're words you wouldn't use, it seems to me, in ordinary conversation or in the course of keeping track of what occurred in your business life, words like "disaster unfold." It's very dramatic, "powerless," "intense pressure," "tortured day," "get rid of him," "brutal." Now, these are words that one would use, it seems to me, in trying to recount feelings perhaps rather than exact interpretations of, what went on. It's the way you felt when somebody said a certain event happened. Am I right in making that conclusion about your diary? Mr. STEINER. I think you're largely correct, Senator. The purpose, as I said before, was to reflect back on recent events and to think about what lessons I might draw and what feelings I may or may not have had. It was also true that more dramatic language can be used as shorthand rather than describing the events in the exact detail in which they occurred. And despite the fact that I kept this for a long time, I did consider it somewhat of a chore at times and did not write as expansively as I might otherwise. Senator BOXER. I also note that in your diary, there are some things that no one is picking up on here. For example, you make a reference to Senator D'Amato. You wrote "the GOP through D'Amato began " a countdown to the 28th which was particularly ironic since he, meaning D'Amato, "bad voted against extending the statute during the RTC reauthorization period. Now, when you wrote that, you didn't actually have information, did you, that the GOP had a meeting and asked Senator DAmato to do this, did you? Mr. STEINER. No, I did not, Senator. Senator BOXER. So your statement that "GOP, through D'Amato," this was a conjecture on your part, is it not? It's something you thought might have happened? Mr. STEINER, That's correct. Senator BOXER. It wasn't meant to be accurate; is that correct, in terms of this diary? Mr. STEINER We as I said before, Senator, it was never my intention to provide a precise narrative. Senator BOXER. I understand. I bring that out because I frankly think that too much is made of this diary. Now, as I understand 359 it, you're not really backing away from the things that you saw firsthand; is that correct? In other words, you I re not backing away from things that you knew when you put them in the diary, things that people actually said to you, you're not backing away from the actual facts? Mr. STEINER. I wouldn't say that I'm backing away from anything Senator. Senator BOXER. Now, when you wrote, "Roger Altman"- The CHAIRMAN. Senator Boxer, would you just stop there. I don't know quite what that phrase means. Either the diary is basically accurate with its facts or it is not. There have been stories to the effect, that I've seen, that you say that the diary is not accurate and she's just asked you a question and you really didn't give a straight answer. Mr. STEINER. Senator, I think I've been very careful, in fact, not to comment publicly on this matter at all in anticipation of appearing here before your Committee. This is the first public comment I have made on this subject. As I said in my opening statement, I think at times my testimony will clarify what I wrote. And I would say that, yes. The CHAIRMAN. If you'll just permit me and I'll restore your time. Senator BOXER. As long as I don't lose my time. The CHAIRMAN. Senator Boxer just asked you the question as to whether the basic facts you relays here, the basic text of what you've said, allowing for some hyperbole and exaggeration, if that is accurate, and the answer should be either yes or no. Is it accurate, the basic text? Mr. STEINER. Senator, as I said, if we went through it, I'd be happy to go through it on a point by point basis and talk about where there are differences and where additional clarity would be helpful. The CHAIRMAN. I think what you're re doing, if I may say respectfully, is what Roger Altman did here on February 24. You're not giving a direct, straight answer. Senator BOXER. Mr. Chairman, I would like to take back my time. And that is not my conclusion at all and I respect your opin ion but on my time I would like the opportunity to say that I do not agree with you here. I think what we have here is a young person who kept a diary about his time in Washington, DC. Now, when he looks back on this time 20 years from now, be doesn't want to think it was all boring. Now, some of the words in here
King Snake
(Tape One) King snake catches and kills mouse. 22:28:09 Snake swallowing rodent. 22:42:20 Snake burying itself underneath leaves to sleep after its meal.
Caneback Rattlesnake
(Tape One) Huge caneback rattle snake crawling and coiling 22:44:02 Zoom in of rattle snake crawling and coiling 22:46:39 Head on CU of tongue
Pilot Black Snake (Black Rat)
(Tape Two) Pilot black snake (aka Black Rat) climbing down tree 22:50:24 Snake crawling on fence 22:51:11 Snake climbing up tree 22:53:54 Reptile resting on tree branch, CU of head 22:56:31 Snake stretching itself out 22:58:53 Snake going up tree again 23:01:16 Snake coming down tree, slithering through autumn leaves
August 2, 1994 - Part 3
(12:35:21) The CHAIRMAN. I want to restore your time, Senator Boxer. Senator BOXER. Thank you. A lot of these phrases in here are te dramatic. As I went through them before, " powerless," "fate- "disaster unfold," "tortured date." You're using language here to indicate your feelings about it, and I respect the fact that you have a lot of feelings because you're not old like we are and you're not numb. And I would repeat, as far as I understand, in your testimony, you re not backing away from the basic facts that you yourself knew firsthand. Mr. STEINER. That's correct, Senator. Senator BOXER. Am I correct? Mr. STEINER. You are. 360 senator BOXER. I thought I was correct on that point. I would like to ask a question to our ethics expert, Mr. Foreman. Would it not be better when a matter comes up that deals with the Presidency and it's very important, and none of us should be holier than thou and say it wouldn't matter to us if we work for the President, be it George Bush, or Ronald Reagan, or Bill Clinton, or anyone else that we wouldn't care about it. Wouldn't it have been better if you, as an ethics officer, had said, since this happened before the President was President, I think it's OK to make one contact, perhaps, to Mr. Nussbaum. I'm not even sure that I think that's correct, but it should have gone straight from there to the President's private counsel, private attorney who would make the comments necessary. Did you ever think about that, that since this was something that happened before the President was President, that all such questions would go not for "no comment" answers, as was indicated earlier because I agree with my colleague, Senator Sasser, and I agree with Mr. Devore, when you say "no comment," that's the worst thing you can say to the press because they'll make a mountain out of a molehill if you say "no comment." But if you refer it to a private attorney who can then say the fact that yes, this matter is proceeding in order, et cetera, and my client did nothing that he or she is ashamed of or whatever. Did you ever think about that notion, of taking this to a private counsel since it was really a private matter that occurred before the President was President? Mr. FOREMAN. Senator, that's a very thoughtful option. As I said, I wasn't aware of the contacts when they occurred last fall. Senator BOXER. But you would consider now, in light of this, that that might be some way to proceed where it is a matter that happened prior to the President becoming President, that it would be better perhaps, or you'll think about it as ethically sounder to refer all of these questions to private counsel? Mr. FOREMAN. That's a very thoughtful option, as I've said, and it makes sense. Senator BOXER. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. The CHAIRMAN. Thank you. Senator Roth. OPENING COMMENTS OF SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. Senator ROTH. Mr. Foreman, as stated in the RTC's written response to Banking Committee questions for the February 24, 1994 hearing, and I quote: It is the policy of RTC not to disclose criminal referrals or information about their preparation on an institution-specific basis. Mr. Foreman, while you are the Designated Agency Ethics Officer of the Treasury Department and not of the RTC, are you aware of the RTC's policy regarding the confidentiality of criminal referrals. Mr. FOREMAN. Senator, I saw that policy for the first time, to the best of my recollection, in March of this year. Senator ROTH. So you were not aware of it on February 24? Mr. FOREMAN. That's exactly correct, Senator. 361 Senator ROTH, Let me ask you this: As the Treasury's Ethics Officer, wouldn't it be proper procedure for any Treasury official to consult with you to obtain ethical clearance prior to providing confidential information to the White House even if that information comes from the RTC since the Treasury official would be disclosing confidential information? Mr. FOREMAN. Senator, that's certainly something that could be done. There's no requirement that every time some activity hap pens, that someone checks with an ethics lawyer before they do it. Senator ROTH. Wouldn't it be the appropriate procedure if it involves confidential information? Mr. FOREMAN. It would have been a good idea, perhaps, to do so, but there's nothing that requires that it be done in every situation.
Scores Buried: Swiss Avalanche Traps Dam Workers
One of the most horrible disasters in Swiss history takes an estimated 90 lives. 1000 men were at work on a hydroelectric project at Saas-Fee near the Italian border when a section of the Allalian Glacier broke off, sending millions of tons of ice & rock hurtling down the mountainside crushing to death 90 lives. Panning LS aftermath of avalanche. MS officials & police standing at rescue site. MSs - men running with empty stretcher. MS military officers wearing overseas caps closing doors of ambulance. MS man getting into rescue helicopter. Air to air shot of rescue chopper flying away from cam. MS crane shovel digging, night. TLS/MSs - rescue crews working, digging through debris, night, one worker wearing leather cap w/ flaps while smoking cigarette. MS rescue dog walking through snow mound. Fuzzy MS man carrying first aid kit, walking on mound. MSs - rescue workers digging, night. TLS crane pulling remains of car crushed by avalanche.
UN Bars Peking - Close Vote Rejects Move To Seat Reds
For the 15th time the United Nations considers the admission of Red China to the world body. The US again leads the opposition to a resolution that would oust Nationalist China and seat the Reds. This year, however, the pattern of voting changes are more and more countries either vote to admit Red China or abstain. The final result is 47 to 47 with 20 abstaining. Observers expect that Red China will be seated next year. New York, New York Camera pans inside the room where members of the General Assembly meet, there are many absentees. A board with all the countries that are enrolled in the United Nations are listed, and before each country that is listed there's a light. As the country is called upon to vote a light comes on. I believe this is an indication if the country is present or voted. Unidentified gentleman reads off the tally of the vote in French. The final tally is 47 - 47, and there was 20 - nations abstaining and 3 not voting. U Thant is sitting on the chair at the desk to your left facing the UN Delegates
Ecuador & Galapagos Islands 1- Sally Lightfoot Crab
(Tape One) Sally lightfoot crab walking around rocks
Rooster
(Tape Two) Roosters crowing, black, orange and red rooster standing on a railing fence 05:49:34 Black rooster on fence does not crow 05:49:55 First rooster trying to crow, jerking head because someone is trying to prompt him 05:50:31 Black rooster crows twice 05:51:24 White rooster flaps wings, puffs up feathers, flaps wings again and crows then hops off fence 05:52:34 Black, red and orange rooster
August 2, 1994 - Part 3
(12:40:30) Senator ROTH. Now, in your deposition, you testified that no one from the Treasury Department consulted with you in advance of the September 29, 1993, meeting, at which Mr. Altman instructed Treasury General Counsel, Jean Hanson, to brief White House Counsel, Bernard Nussbaum, on the confidential RTC referrals regarding Madison Guaranty; is that correct? Mr. FOREMAN.Yes, Senator, it is. Senator ROTH. Now, Mr. Foreman, three Treasury Department officials, Ms. Hanson, Mr. Steiner, and Jack Devore, attended the October 14, 1993, meeting at the White House, at which there was further discussion of confidential information re regarding the RTC referrals regarding Madison Guaranty. Did any of these three officials or anyone else from the Treasury Department consult with you to seek out your ethics opinion prior to that meeting? Mr. FOREMAN. To the best of my recollection, Senator Roth, they did not. Senator ROTH. So despite the fact that the September 29 and Oc- tober 14 meetings involved Treasury officials discussing confiden- tial information regarding RTC criminal referrals with White House officials, you , Mr. Foreman, as the Agency Ethics Officer were not consulted in advance regarding the propriety of these meetings; is that correct? Mr. FOREMAN, Senator, I'm sorry, I don't know the facts behind your first phrase, but as to the second phrase, I was not-that is, the despite, as you mentioned. I don't know the facts there. But certainly, as you say, I was not consulted. Senator ROTH. Mr. Foreman, you also testified in your deposition that as Agency Ethics Officer, you were not consulted regarding the propriety of any telephone conversations or other contacts between Ms. Hanson and Mr. Altman and anybody in the White House prior to February 1, 1994. Mr. FOREMAN. Yes, Senator, that's correct. Senator ROTH. On February 2, Mr. Altman and Ms. Hanson met with White House officials, including those outside of the White House Counsel's Office, to further discuss the RTC criminal referrals regarding Madison. Mr. Altman has said that you met with Ms. Hanson prior to the meeting and provided your ethical clearance. Yet, in your deposition, you stated that neither the words "ethics" or "clearance" were ever used in your brief discussion with Ms. Hanson prior to the February 2 meeting; is that correct? 362 Mr. FOREMAN. Senator, I must have misunderstood. I though I thought you began your question with saying that they went to the White House to further discuss the criminal referrals. Not to my knowledge edge. I believe that February 2 meeting only related to procedures about the civil claims, if I may. Senator ROTH. But let me ask, in your deposition, you did state that neither the words "ethics" or "clearance" were used in your brief Mr. FOREMAN. That's correct, Senator. Senator ROTH. You also testified, in your deposition that, in fact no formal ethical review was conducted prior to the February 2, 1994 meeting; is that correct? Mr. FOREMAN. No formal ethical review in terms of research, analysis, and hours of thought, that's correct. Senator ROTH. Now, you did have a meeting with Ms. Hanson about 90 minutes before Ms. Hanson and Roger Altman went to the February 2, White House meeting; is that correct? Mr. FOREMAN. To the best of my recollection, Senator Roth, it was midafternoon. If that turns out to he 90 minutes, then that's correct. Senator ROTH. Roughly that time. Mr. FOREMAN. Yes, Senator. Senator ROTH. As I understand it, this meeting lasted 2 or 3 minutes and neither the word "ethics" nor "clearance" was used? Mr. FOREMAN. That's correct, Senator. Senator ROTH. At the February 2, 1994, White House meeting, Mr. Altman apparently claimed that be had received a verbal opinion from Ethics Counsel that be did not legally have to recuse himself Did you give such a verbal opinion? Mr. FOREMAN. I don't recall doing so, Senator, no. Senator ROTH. Or did you tell Ms. Hanson before that meeting that you thought Mr. Altman should recuse himself? Mr. FOREMAN. Yes, Senator, I did. Senator ROTH. Mr. Foreman, in your deposition, you. were read the following quotation from Mr. Altman's, March 3, 1994, letter to the Banking Committee, and I quote: Treasury General Counsel who had also attended the meeting has advised me that before the meeting, she sat down with this Department's Designated Ethics Ofricer. She informed him of the purposes of the meeting and asked his view. He advised her that he saw no problem.
Meg Visits Studio: Princess Sees How Movies Are Made
Princess Margaret and the Earl of Snowden are welcomed to Universal city by Jules Stein, Board Chairman of MCA. The Royal pair greet a full house of Hollywood stars and then tour the studio to see movies in production and watch stunt men. California Princess and her husband, the Earl of Snowden standing in a lobby at Universal City. Throngs of photographers and newsmen and women. Slightly High Angle Shot - Bobby Darren and his wife, Sandra Dee greet the British Royalty. Slightly High Angle Shot - Lana Turner and her husband, Robert Eaton. MCU Maurice Chevalier. Photographers taking pictures. Princess Margaret and her husband sitting on a tour bus. Princess Margaret sitting next to Alfred Hitchcock on a movie set and the Earl of Snowden climbs up a latter to look through the lens of a camera. Studio winter scene and the Princess picks up some studio snow in her hand.
Air Force 14 - Army 3
The Air Force Falcons score their first victory over another Service Academy and they take the measure of Army in Chicago. Paul Stein shines and he completes 9 of 18 passes as the falcons, appropriately enough, stage an aerial attack. Final score: Air Force 14 - Army 3. Chicago, Illinois Solders Field located on the lakefront in Chicago, Illinois. Air Force and Army's marching bands. High Angle Long Shot - Throngs of Army soldiers. High Angle Shot - Paul Stein Air Force passes the football. It is caught and it was good for 34 yards. Operating out of a shot gun formation, Stein cannot find a receiver, so he runs through the middle and scores a touchdown. High Angle Shot - Air Force shoots down the Army passes, holding Army at bay at the 20 yard line and making Army settle for 3 point field goal. Scoreboard Air Force 7 - Army 3. High Angle Shot - Stein passes the football and it is good for 28 yards. On 4th down, Stein gambles and passes instead of kicking a field goal. It is caught in the end zone and scores a touchdown. Scoreboard Air Force 14 - Army 3. High Angle Shot - The entire Air Force Academy run on to the field cheering the football players.
Tragedy At Sea: Humdreds Rescued From Ship Fire
Rescue vessels arrive in Nassau with survivors of a fire at sea. They were passengers on the vacation cruise of the Yarmouth Castle which caught fire at midnight and sank. Upwards of 80 are dead or missing in the worst sea disaster in American waters since the Morro Castle. Because of the disastrous fire in 1965 and the loss of both passengers and ship this prompted new laws regarding safety at sea. On November 13, 1965 shortly before 1:00 am a mattress stored too close to a lighting circuit in a storage room caught on fire. The ship's alarms did not sound and the ship's sprinkler system did not activate. The flames swept through the ships super structure at great speed and it was fed by the ship's natural ventilation system. The ropes used to lower life boats burned before the boats could be lowered. The halls of the ship were filled with fire and smoke, people squeezed through their port holes to escape the fire, some did not make it. Eighty-seven people went down with the ship, three rescued passengers later died at hospitals. The final death toll was 90 Rescue vessels arrive at Nassau's port, people standing at the railing as the ship pulls in. People disembarking from the ship, family and friends standing on the pier waiting for their loved one's to arrive. MCU Many of the rescued passengers disembarking from the ship, upwards to 80 others are missing and presumed dead. CU Lady appears to be in shock.
Cuban Evacuation: 1st Official Boat Arrives In US
Another mercy ship on a different mission arrives in Florida. AUS chartered vessel carries Cuban refugees stranded on the island when Castro ended the sea exodus. The US will continue the sea evacuation until an airlift begins in a few weeks. Miami, Florida Sign / United States Coast Guard - Cuban Refugee - Receiving Center - Customs Immigration USPHS. An excursion boat chattered by the United States. People standing at the guard railing of the ship, some are waving. A crew member throws out a rope to help secure the boat at the pier. Refugees, 108 of them. Refugees disembarking from the boat carrying hardly anything, just a bag, or babies, nothing more. The refugees are taken to a room where they can pick out some donated clothes and other items they may need. A woman giving a little boy a drink of milk as he sits by his mother, another woman giving her baby boy a drink of milk.
THE WAR LORD Spectacular Movie Has Detroit Premiere
Things start popping in Detroit when fighting breaks out among Eleventh Century Warriors - but it's all in a good cause - the world premiere of "The War Lord", a new Universal Pictures production that weaves a love story against a background of violence and warfare during the Dark Ages. Charlton Heston, Guy Stockwell and Henry Wilcoxon are on hand for the movie opening. Detroit, Michigan Marquee on the theater - Charlton Heston and Richard Boone In "The War Lord" - Rosemary Forsyth, Guy Stockwell and Henry Wilcoxon. Studio actors dressed up in costumes sword fighting in front of the theater. CU Teenage girls holding up makeshift posters - The War Lords. the camera pans down the line making sure that all the girls make it on the film. CUS - Henry Wilcoxon. CUS - Three ladies, one young, smile and flirt with Mr. Wilcoxon. CUS - Guy Stockwell. CUS - Girl fans. A young and handsome Charlton Heston.
Mississippi 14 - Tennessee 13
The stadium at Memphis is jumping as undefeated Tennessee takes on Mississippi in the Southeastern Conference. Tennessee scores first in a wide open game. Ole Miss ties it up, the Volunteers go ahead again, but miss the extra point to lead 13 - 7. Then Mississippi goes across in the last quarter but they make the extra point to end Tennessee's undefeated season. Mississippi 14 - Tennessee 13. Memphis, Tennessee People seated in the football stadium watching the marching band of Tennessee. Tennessee hands of the football and it is run 55 yards with some great blocking along the way. Tennessee quarterback looking around for a receiver and he can't find one so he runs the ball himself, gaining some respectable yardage. Tennessee dives over the left guard and gets on the scoreboard 7 to 0. Kicks off to Mississippi and and they get a 69 yard return to Tennessee's 23. A pass by Mississippi is to the 13 yard line as the quarter ends. Missippi opens the second quarter with a trip around right end, tying up the game 7 - 7. Mississippi runs into trouble in the second as a pass is intercepted and Tennessee runs to the 23 yard line. Mississppi for 9 yards. Mississippi goes over at the two right into the end zone. Tennessee kicks for the extra point and misses. MS - Scoreboard. Mississippi quarterback throws the ball. Ole Miss Quarterback runs with the ball, to the left to the 1 yard line. Mississippi hands off ball and it is over and into the end zone making the score 13 to 13. High Angle Shot - Mississippi kicks the ball and it sails over the field goal and Mississippi wins 14 to Tennessee's 13.
August 2, 1994 - Part 3
(12:45:29) Mr. FOREMAN. That's correct. Senator ROTH. Why is that? Mr. FOREMAN. Well, I have described in my opening statement what occurred. If I may take 30 seconds to explain one comment. I am the Designated Ethics Official. I've worked with Ms. Hanson for over a year. When she comes to me for my advice, she doesn't have to lay out what considerations she wants to hear from me. She knows I'm the Senior Ethics Official. Obviously without her stating it aloud, one of the reasons she asked me to look at the talking points was to see if I had any ethical responses, and that's the question about nonpublic information, which is certainly an 363 ethics standards of conduct thing, was very much in my mind as I reviewed those talking points. Senator ROTH. Mr, Chairman, I know my time is up but I do have some additional questions. The CHAIRMAN. We'll come back around. That's true, I think, for almost every Senator. Senator Campbell. OPENING COMMENTS OF SENATOR BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL Senator CAMPBELL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. While we've been asking questions, I'm sitting here trying to remember what I did on February 1st, or the 2nd, or the 3rd, and I can't remember a thing of who I met with or who I talked to. And we 've been going through 3 days now of "he said, but she said, but I said," and so much is being made out of the exact responses that I would hope that the inability to remember exactly what they were doing that long ago wouldn't be construed as intentional misconduct, certainly not criminal behavior. But often that's the way it's viewed, I guess. I'm not particularly interested in Mr. Steiner's diary. I want to associate myself with many of the comments my friend Barbara Boxer made, except I do worry a little bit about people thinking we're old and numb, instead, they might think we're old and dumb after we get done with this. That diary was written, much of it on the spur of the moment, much with very dramatic and passionate responses that I would think a young person would write, and very sporadic, sometimes not making any entries for 6 weeks at a time. I rarely write notes except to remind myself of things, but I know if I write things down and 6 weeks later I look at it I can't remem- ber what the beck I was supposed to do with that note, So I don't put an awful lot of credibility in how important his diary is. One thing that does come through very strong to me with Mr. Steiner is that it's really a shame we put him through this kind of an inquisition because I think it really discourages young people from oing into public service in the first place. While I was listening to him testify, I was wondering to myself how much he would rather be back at the New York Library than here and, I think, if I was in his place, I would probably consider that too. It's probably a little less traumatic. The other thing is that it sends a message to young people coming in Government services, don't take notes. Don't keep any diaries because you don't know what the heck they're going to be used for or when they're going to be subpoenaed. I hope you won't give up on Government because of your bad experience here. I just really bad one on two questions for Mr. Foreman dealing with ethics because I don't know quite how it works, but as I understand it, you're the Senior Ethics Officer; is that correct, Mr. Foreman? Mr. FOREMAN. Yes, that's correct for the Department, Senator CAMPBELL. What is the relationship between Treasury and the RTC in their ethics-each agency has its own ethics officer and they comply with the Government Code of Ethics. Is there 364 some interaction, or some connection, or does RTC even have a ethics system in place? Mr. FOREMAN. Senator, they do have a very fine ethics senior officer, and we worked together on a number of matters in 1993. Senator CAMPBELL. You do have regular interaction with RTC? Mr. FOREMAN. We did in 1993, at least, when Mr. Altman was the interim CEO. Senator CAMPBELL. Under normal conditions, you're the one that would suggest to Treasury officials if they were going to do something, whether it would be considered within the boundaries of the ethical behavior standards of conduct or not. Mr. FOREMAN. Myself or one of the senior ethics lawyers who works for me, sir. Senator CAMPBELL. But RTC, they're advised by somebody else? Mr. FOREMAN. Yes, sir, that's correct. Senator CAMPBELL. en does something become public information? If you were giving advice on the use of some ethical standard dealing with public information, before it became public-Senator Bond mentioned this and I'm not sure I can phrase It the same way-but I understand that the ethical behavior stays the same, whether it's nonpublic or becomes public; is that correct? Mr. FOREMAN. There may be different factors that you would look to see whether there's an ethical violation, sir, depending on whether it's public or nonpublic information. And there's a provision or several provisions in the standards of conduct that speak to those kinds of distinctions.
Red-Hot Hot Rods
They even have a Queen at the Hot-Rod Show in New York where the uninitiated would be lost and hardly give some of these creations garage-room. However, some of these customized cars are valued as high as $70,000 (two cigarettes lighters standard) and on display in the car built for the Munster s - the ideal wagon for a ghost-to-ghost tour. New York, NY The Queen of the Hot Rod Show. High Angle Shot - A go-cart. CUS - A dragster named, 'Mortician'. CUS - A formed mahogany body, looks sort of like a jeep, with a VW frame and motor underneath. MS - Man pulling off the tarp of a car named Casper's Ghost. CU - A chromed out motorcycle. CU - Beach Buggy. MS - Surf board car built for two, a blond model sits in the car. MS - The Munster Car. MS - Proto-type car listed at $70,000.
Purdue 35 - Minnesota 0
At Lafayette, Indiana, Purdue goes on a rampage against hapless Minnesota. After a scoreless first quarter, the Boilermakers turn on the steam and the Gophers can do nothing but head for their hole. Final score: Purdue 35 - Minnesota 0. Lafayette, Indiana A high angle, wide shot overlooking the football field and the stands filling up. Throngs of football fans filling up the stand's. Purdue has the ball, passes and the receiver catches it and fights his way through all the way to the end zone - touchdown. Purdue has the ball, the quarterback hands it off and fights his way to gain 11 yards. Purdue passes the ball and gets to the 1 yard line. Purdue hands the football and dives over his blockers - touchdown! Bad pass by Minnesota, it turns out to be a fumble and Purdue recovers the ball. Purdue goes over the blockers and scores his third touchdown. A pass by Minnesota and it is intercepted by Purdue and Purdue scores the final touchdown.
Meg Ending Tour: Princess Captivated By New York City
Winding up her three week tour of the US in New York, Princess Margaret hits a hectic schedule. East Side, West Side - all Around the Town. She visits the Metropolitan Museum of Art and a Police Athletic League clubhouse for children and seems at home in any strata of New York. She says that her visit will be among her indelible memories. New York, New York Princess Margaret walks into the Metropolitan Museum of Art as throngs of curious admirers stand behind a roped off area with smiles on their faces. Teenage girls waving and smiling at the princess. Princess Margaret looking at John Singleton Copley art work, he was foremost artist in America who spent his last 40 years of his life living in England. Princess Margaret and the Earl of Snowden visit New York's lower East side. A little girl presenting the Princess with a bouquet of flowers. New Yorkers standing behind police barriers smiling, waving and making sure the Princess feels welcome in New York. Princess Margaret and her entourage visiting St. Patrick Youth Center in New York. Young boys, girls and adults behind police barriers waving and smiling. The Princess visits a church on Long Island, it could be a Catholic, Presbyterian or an American Church of England.