Advanced Search
Small two story apartment building
Small two story apartment building
Building (day & night)
Building (day & night)
Topi
04:37:09 Topi herd, harem
Impala
04:39:32 World record bull impala and his harem, fight zebra barking
Impala
17:30:15 Baby impala 17:38:33 Male impala, alert, CU horns
Beisa Oryx
17:47:53 Beisn oryx
Wildebeest
16:10:33 White bearded wilbeest drinking
Wildebeest
22:59:38 White-bearded wildebeest Male herd, harem
Impala
01:23:14 Male impala running and jumping (pronging)
Gerenuk ( Waller's Gazelle )
16:26:39 Male gernuk
Gerenuk ( Waller's Gazelle )
17:56:40 Female gernuk stand erect to feed 17:58:46 Male gernuk stand erect to feed
Thompsons Gazelle
22:55:06 Male Thompsons gazelle
Grants Gazelle
22:55:37 Male Grant's gazelle walking and Tommy gazelle
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 29, 1974 (2/2)
[01.15.29] The CHAIRMAN. The time of the gentleman has expired, The gentleman from Mississippi, Mr. Lott, is recognized. Mr. LOTT. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would first perhaps submit, or ask my colleague from South Carolina, who is the underdog now? Mr. MANN. I would like to answer that. Mr. LOTT. All right, sir. I yield, Mr. MANN'. Because I am fully aware that many American people consider that the President is being attacked and abused by sinister forces in this country, by the leftwing press or by the Democrats, and I can assure this gentleman that it matters not to me his party or his position. He is subject to the rule of law, and to justice, and in my role under my oath, he will get it, be he President or be he pauper. Mr. LOTT. I appreciate the seriousness of the gentleman, and I, too, share that feeling. And I think that knowing of my background, I think he knows that this is not a matter of partisanship with me, either. It is a very serious matter. We are, setting a precedent for the future of whether or not a President, because he is unpopular, because of some acts of his aides, even mistakes, or parts of several cases-will a President be impeached. Now, several of you here tonight referred to a gentleman by the name of Butterfield that came in and testified, and I would like to refer to some of his testimony. In one area he testified "everything I am saying to you, incidentally, is judgment, guess. I don't claim to be-to have precise knowledge." And -when I asked him questions about. his position sitting right there in the middle of the White House, right next to the Oval Office, I said: In view of your situation, your location there, and of what has subsequently occurred, and the fact that you were staying abreast of -what was going on, did you have any knowledge of the Watergate cover-up? No, he did not. But he was sitting there right next to -what -was going on, right next to the President. And I asked him did he know about the Plumbers? He did not. Now, -what we have got here in article II is a catch-all accusation. It lumps together five separate charges with a connecting link of only certain common phrases. The purpose, in my opinion, is to put together several partial cases with the hope that the result would be one whole case. Grouping these different charges together in one article represents a clear attempt to accumulate guilty votes, and would be completely improper under any theory of criminal proceeding. In subparagraph 1 of article 11. the President is accused of trying to improperly use the IRS. In subparagraph 3, he is accused of the Watergate cover-up and other unlawful activities which were subsequently specified. There is no real connection between them. It is clear, through, why the catch-all approach has been adopted, and why that is the approach being used. A Congressman who believes that the President should be removed from office for interfering with the FBI may add his vote to the total, even though he does not believe, for example, that the President in any way approved the break-in into the office of Dr. Fielding. Another Congressman may vote for the entire article because he subscribes to one paragraph and he may not subscribe to subparagraph 5. In criminal justice, such words as duplicity and prejudicial joinder of offenses would come into play, but we do not have it here. I think that we do have parts of several cases, and maybe it gets up to three-fourths of a case, or an eighth, or whatever, but you get them together and you get on a tack, and lot me quote the words of Senator Austen in the impeachment trial of Judge Ritter in 1936: "Six legal noughts cannot become a unit of legal accountability." Again, I think we must consider the overall impact of what -we are doing here is going to have on our country for years to come. [01.19.59]
Africa II - Topi
Topi standing guard on a mound
Boat Race Seine River
NO AUDIO In Paris, on the River Seine, a race of ninety high powered motorboats roar up and down for six hours. The "Six Hours of Paris is considered the world's toughest motorboat race. An Italian Catamaran wins. Only forty boats are able to finish. MS POV- Shot from atop of a bridge or a deck of a boat with the Eiffel Tower in the far background and speed boats toward you. CU of one man speed boats zipping around one another towards the camera one after the other. On the River Seine, the boats bounce past a huge barge. The speed boats coming at you and another type of boat, that doesn t look to be in the race passing under bridges. CU of the pilot of the NU Mile chief boat. Speed boat 01-34 racing past the camera. Speedboat SP 39 bouncing as it speeds its way down the river. CU of Speed boat No #23 stirs up the water as it makes a sharp turn in the opposite direction. CU of the side and bottom of "Jicey France. The Pilot is practically driving on his side. Several speed boats race in and out of frame past a slower moving boat. Various shots of boats flying down and out of the water. The Checkered flag is waved and the race is over. Number 80 ON wins. CU of the pilot of the speed boat.
Impeachment Hearings: House Judiciary Committee, July 29, 1974 (2/2)
[01.25.55] I recognize the gentleman from Wisconsin, Mr. Froehlich. Mr. FROEHLICH. . Mr. Chairman, my concern over the extended use of the wiretaps and the abusive use of the IRS have been fully developed here, this evening and today, and I, therefore, yield to the gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Latta. The CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from Ohio is recognized. Mr. LATTA. Can I take my time now, Mr. Chairman.-' The CHAIRMAN. Without objection, it is so ordered, and the gentleman is so recognized. Mr. LATTA. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Mr. Froehlich for yielding to me. Mr. Chairman, if -we had not had all these -weeks of in-depth study on the evidentiary material I frankly would have a hard time making a judgment on this article after hearing all of these remarks that have been made by our colleagues, I think this probably is attributable to the fact that I believe in the history of the Congress that there has not been a committee that has studied so intently for or' such a long period of time and given such attention, and I do not believe we have ever had a committee in the Congress that has had better attendance, even be hind closed doors at committee sessions. And I want to commend you, Mr. Chairman, for the attention that, you have given and the direction that you have given in this committee. Certainly there are disagreements, and I think by now there is one thing on which we can all agree, however, and that is that, there are many areas of disagreement. And our vote depends on which into interpretation we place upon them. If we choose to view the President in a bad light, we can do that, and if we *choose to view him in a good light, there is ample evidence to permit us to do that. We have also learned this afternoon that a majority on this committee wishes to hold a President impeachable for actions of subordinates under subparagraphs 1 and 2, even though he had no knowledge of the action of said subordinates. Now, Mr. Chairman and members of this committee and fellow Americans, this bothers me tremendously. Mr. RAILSBACK. Would the gentleman yield? Mr. LATTA. I will be happy to yield. Mr. RAILSBACK. Thank you for yielding. You are not suggesting, I take it, that in respect to the subparagraph 1 relating to IRS that on September 15, there was no conversation between John Dean and the President at which time John Dean has testified that there was an extensive discussion about the IRS audits? Mr. LATTA. I have direct reference to the refusal of this committee to adopt the Wiggins amendment. Mr. Chairman, as I say, this bothers me tremendously, not only for now, but for the future. What we do here, will be written down as a precedent to be used in the future, and I'm not particularly concerned about the present occupant of the White House. I am most deeply concerned about the Office of the President of the United States, and -where that Office will be not 10 years from now or 20 years from now, but in generations to come, because I highly revere that office. It is the most respected office in all the world, and it is the most powerful. Nobody can deny the fact. that every nation on the face of this globe looks to the Oval Office of the, President of the United States, and what we are saying here is that we can impeach a, President for actions of his subordinates without his knowledge. And what can that do to the Office, of the President in the future, when you -can impeach for actions of a subordinate without his knowledge? As members of this committee know there, are approximately 3,900 employees at the Executive Office of the President. There are, 2,600,000 employees of the Federal Government. not counting the military. Could somebody down the line. years hence interpret our actions here that he would have to be held accountable, for any and all of these actions, even though he had no knowledge of them, because they are under his jurisdiction, under his administration, and technically they are? So, I think that -we must proceed with utmost caution, that 'We, weaken, that we weaken that office that we hold so dear. [01.31.22]
Africa II - White Bearded Wildebeest
Whitebearded wildebeest baby
Africa II - Defassa Waterbuck
04:39:08 Defassa waterbuck
Africa II - Thomson's Gazelle
04:40:28 Baby thomson's gazelle 04:41:27 Thomson's gazelles running
Africa II - Whitebearded Wildebeest
04:41:50 Whitebearded wildebeest and sunrise 04:45:58 Whitebearded wildebeest and calf
Africa II - Masai Giraffe
04:48:30 Masai giraffe 04:50:40 Masai giraffe skeleton
Africa II - Burchell's Zebra
04:51:12 Burchell's zebras at waterhole dusting 04:53:18 Burchell's zebras at waterhole drinking PART TWO 04:58:02 Burchell's zebras at waterhole
LBJ Departs For Asian Tour Goal, Vietnam Peace
NO AUDIO From Dulles International Airport, President and Mrs. Johnson, leave on a six nation, 17 day Asian tour. They will visit Hawaii, New Zealand, Australia, The Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, and Korea. The 7 nation Summit Conference on Vietnam at Manila, is the prime purpose of the trip. MS Helicopter with "United States Of America" written on the side lands on the tarmac at Dulles International Airport. Military band standing at attention as President Johnson and Vice President Humphrey walk by. Lady Bird Johnson and Mrs. Humphrey walking behind their husbands. CU Profile of Lady Bird Johnson, President Johnson and Vice President Humphrey. CU Naval Honor Guard standing at attention. Mrs. Johnson and President Johnson shake hands of supporters. President and Mrs. Lyndon Baines Johnson embarking onto plane and waving goodbye. Air Force One "United States Of America" taxing toward the run-way.